Gauhati High Court
CRP/175/2025 of SATTAR KHA Vs SMT EKRAM ALI MOLLAH on 15 September 2026
GAHC010222932025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : CRP/175/2025 SATTAR KHA S/O SAIMUDDIN KHA, R/O MASPARA, P.O AND P.S -BILASIPARA, DISTRICT- DHUBRI, ASSAM VERSUS SMT EKRAM ALI MOLLAH W/O LATE BOYAT ALI MOLLAH, R/O MAJPARA VILLAGE,
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010222932025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : CRP/175/2025
SATTAR KHA
S/O SAIMUDDIN KHA, R/O MASPARA, P.O AND P.S -BILASIPARA, DISTRICT- DHUBRI, ASSAM
VERSUS
SMT EKRAM ALI MOLLAH
W/O LATE BOYAT ALI MOLLAH, R/O MAJPARA VILLAGE, P.O AND P.S- BILASIPARA, DISTRICT- DHUBRI, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : DR. B N GOGOI, Advocate for the Respondent : MR. I ALAM, MR. T SK,MR. H ALI
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 16.09.2026
1. Heard Dr. B. N. Gogoi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. T. Sk, learned counsel for the respondent who submits that the Trial Court has already disposed of Title Suit No. 121/2023 on 28.08.2026 and in support of his submission, he has furnished a copy of the judgment dated 28.08.2026, passed in Title Suit No. 121/2023.
Page No.# 2/2
2. Though, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent ought not to have informed the Trial Court regarding pendency of this revision petition, however, as no stay was granted on the proceeding of Title Suit No. 121/2023, there was no bar for the trial court to proceed with the same.
3. The petitioner may now avail other remedies which are available to him under the law.
4. This civil revision petition has become infructuous and, as such, it is dismissed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant