Gauhati High Court

I.A.(Civil)/3329/2025 of KAUSHAL SINGH Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 10 ORS on 15 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010135832025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3329/2025 KAUSHAL SINGH S/O- LATE RAJ BALLAB SINGH R/O- LEDO KALPARA LEDO COAL PARA P.O. LEDO SUB-DISTRICT- MARGHERITA DIST. TINSUKIA ASSAM PIN- 786182. VERSUS

GAHC010135832025

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3329/2025

KAUSHAL SINGH

S/O- LATE RAJ BALLAB SINGH

R/O- LEDO KALPARA

LEDO COAL PARA

P.O. LEDO

SUB-DISTRICT- MARGHERITA

DIST. TINSUKIA

ASSAM

PIN- 786182.

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 10 ORS

REPRSENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF

ASSAM

ENVIRONMENT

FOREST AND CLIMATE CHANGE DEPARTMENT

DISPUR

GUWAHATI-781006.

2:THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST AND HEAD OF FOREST

FORCE

ASSAM

PANJABARI

GUWAHATI-781037.

3:THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER

DIGBOI DIVISION

DIGBOI

DIST. TINSUKIA

ASSAM

PIN- 786171.

4:THE RANGE OFFICER

LEKHAPANI FOREST RANGE

UNDER DIGBOI FOREST DIVISION

DIST. TINSUKIA

ASSAM

PIN- 786182.

5:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER

TINSUKIA

DIST. TINSUKIA

ASSAM

PIN- 786125.

6:THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE

LEKHAPANI POLICE STATION

DIST. TINSUKIA

ASSAM

PIN- 786182.

7:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

DIST. CHANGLANG ARUNACHAL PRADESH.

8:THE ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

JAIRAMPUR SUB-DIVISION

DIST. CHANGLANG

ARUNACHAL PRADESH.

9:THE STATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH

THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY

ITANAGAR

ARUNACHAL PRADESH.

10:SMTI PARISHMITA NEOG

FOREST RANGER

DIBRUGARH SF RANGE

DIBRUGARH SF DIVISION

DIST. DIBRUGARH

ASSAM-786001.

11:T. C. RANJITH RAM

DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER

NORTH KAMRUP DIVISION

RANGIA

DIST. KAMRUP

ASSAM

PIN- 781354.

Advocate for : MR. B D KONWAR SR. ADV.

Advocate for : appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 10 ORS

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 16.09.2026

Heard Mr. H. Agarwal, learned counsel for the applicant; Mr. D. Gogoi, learned Standing Counsel, Forest Department, Government of Assam for the opposite party nos. 1 – 4 & 10; Mr. N. Goswami, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the opposite party nos. 5 & 6; Mr. A. Chandran, learned Senior Government Advocate, Arunachal Pradesh for the opposite party nos. 7 – 9; and Mr. M. Sarma, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 11. The learned counsel for the parties have submitted that in view of the fact situation presently obtaining, this interlocutory application has become infructuous. The interlocutory application stands accordingly closed.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead