Gauhati High Court
AB/2055/2026 of BISWAJIT SINGHA AND 2 ORS Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 15 September 2026
GAHC010184592026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2055/2026 BISWAJIT SINGHA AND 2 ORS S/O LATE BRAJABABU SINGHA, R/O VILL. NARSINGPUR, PT I, P.S. SONAI, DIST. CACHAR, PIN 788115, ASSAM. 2: MONIKA SINGHA W/O GULAMJIT
GAHC010184592026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/2055/2026
BISWAJIT SINGHA AND 2 ORS
S/O LATE BRAJABABU SINGHA, R/O VILL. NARSINGPUR, PT I, P.S. SONAI, DIST. CACHAR, PIN 788115, ASSAM.
2: MONIKA SINGHA
W/O GULAMJIT SINGHA
R/O VILL. NARSINGPUR PT I
P.S. SONAI
DIST. CACHAR
PIN 788115
ASSAM.
3: SAROJINI SINGHA
W/O LATE BRAJABABU SINGH
R/O VILL. NARSINGPUR PT I
P.S. SONAI
DIST. CACHAR
PIN 788115
ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY PP, ASSAM.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S C BISWAS, MR. MEHUL SHAH,MR. P S BISWAS,MS A
DAS,MS. S. CHANDA,MS. K L R YANTHAN,P SHARMA,MS. R DEVI
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
16.09.2026
1. Heard Mr. S. C. Biswas, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D. P. Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor.
2. This petition under Section 482 BNSS is filed by the petitioners, namely, (1) Biswajit Singha (2) Smt. Monika Singha (3) Smt. Sarojini Singha, apprehending arrest in connection with Sonai P.S. Case No. 73/2026 registered u/s 109(1)/118(2)/324(4)/34 of BNS.
3. The case arose out of an FIR lodged on 17/7/2026 by the father of the alleged victim, stating that his son and friends were taking some prasad near one temple, whereupon the accused no.1 created some problems, and later, all the accused persons tried to assault him with a dao. It is also alleged that accused no. A-3 assaulted his son, caused injuries. The learned counsel submits that they have appeared and co-operated with the investigation.
4. Though case diary was called for but learned additional Public Prosecutor, Mr. Goswami submits that the charge sheet has been submitted upon completion of investigation vide CS No. 83/26 dated 27.08.2026.
5. In view of the completion of investigation and cooperation rendered by the petitioners, the interim bail granted on 31.08.2026 is hereby made absolute subject to the condition that the petitioners:
(a) shall be available for trial, if one commences; (b) shall not hamper or tamper with the evidence of the case.
(c) shall not influence or threaten or harm the victim and her family members.
6. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application stands allowed and disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant