Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/2437/2026 of SWGWM MUCHAHARY Vs BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED AND 2 ORS. on 15 September 2026
GAHC010141332026 2026:GAU-AS:13701 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2437/2026 SWGWM MUCHAHARY S/O-GOPAL MUCHAHARY, VILL.-KAMARDWISA, P.O.-SIMLA, P.S.-SIMLA, DIST.-BAKSA, ASSAM-781330 VERSUS BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL
GAHC010141332026
2026:GAU-AS:13701
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2437/2026
SWGWM MUCHAHARY
S/O-GOPAL MUCHAHARY, VILL.-KAMARDWISA, P.O.-SIMLA, P.S.-SIMLA, DIST.-BAKSA, ASSAM-781330
VERSUS
BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED AND 2 ORS.
REPRESENTED BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER, G.S. ROAD, SHREEJI
TOWERS, 3RD FLOOR, NEAR CHRISTIANBASTI, WALFORD, GUWAHATI, P.O.-BHANGAGARH, DIST.-KAMRUP M, ASSAM-781005
POLICY NO.OG-20-2405-1828-0000-2066 VALID FROM 13.08.2019 TO
12.08.2024
2:GOPAL MUCHAHARY
S/O-CHONDI CHORAN MUCHAHARY
VILL.-KAMARDOICHA
P.O.-KAMARDOICHA
P.S.-SIMIA
DIST.-BAKSA
ASSAM
PIN-781330 .REGD. OWNER OF THE OFFENDING VEHICLE NO.AS-28-B- 1744 MOTOR CYCLE
3:AJOY DAIMARY
S/O- KHAGEN DAIMARY
VILL.-KHAMARDWISA
P.O.-KHAMARDWISA
P.S.-SIMLA
DIST.-BAKSA
ASSAM PIN-781330. .DRIVER OF OFFENDING VEHICLE NO.AS-28-B-1744
MOTOR CYCL
Advocate for the Petitioner : T UDDIN, MR. S AHMED
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. P M TALUKDAR(R1), MS. R HUSSAIN(R1),MR. R
BAISHYA(R1)
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 16/09/2026 Heard learned counsel, Ms. S. Ahmed for the applicant is present. Also heard Ms. R. Hussain for the respondent No. 1/Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited.
2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the respondent No. 1 prays that she may be allowed to file an objection in the instant application.
3. This application has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act praying for condoning 29 days in filing the connected appeal against the impugned judgment and award dated 09.03.2026 in MAC Case No. 1371/2021 passed by the learned MACT No. 3 Kamrup(M), Guwahati. The applicant has explained the reasons for the delay at paragraph 3, 4, 5 & 6 of the application. This Court has perused the same and finds that sufficient cause has been shown by the applicant explaining the delay of 29 days. This Court is of the view that no useful purpose will be served by allowing the respondent to file objection in the instant case. Accordingly, the delay of 29 days in filing the connected appeal is condoned and the application is allowed.
4. The respondent Nos. 2 & 3 are struck off from the array of respondents as their presence is not necessary in the instant application.
5. The Registry shall registered the main MAC Appeal and list the same for Admission hearing after 1 (one) week. JUDGE Comparing Assistant