Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/6068/2025 of RUDHIR KUMAR DAIMARY Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS on 15 September 2026
GAHC010235502025 2026:GAU-AS:13711 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6068/2025 RUDHIR KUMAR DAIMARY S/O- DAMBARUDHAR BRAHMA. R/O- WARD NO. 7, BAGANSHALI, KOKRAJHAR, ASSAM,PIN- 783370. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS
GAHC010235502025
2026:GAU-AS:13711
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/6068/2025
RUDHIR KUMAR DAIMARY
S/O- DAMBARUDHAR BRAHMA.
R/O- WARD NO. 7, BAGANSHALI, KOKRAJHAR, ASSAM,PIN- 783370.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.
OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN AFFAIRS, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006, ASSAM.
2:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL
KOKRAJHAR
PIN- 783370
ASSAM
3:THE DIRECTOR
TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING
ASSAM
GUWAHATI
DISPUR
PIN -781006
4:THE SECRETARY
URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL
KOKRAJHAR
ASSAM
PIN- 783370
5:THE KOKRAJHAR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
REPRESENTED BY ITS MEMBER SECRETARY
KOKRAJHAR
PIN- 783370
ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR P BHARDWAJ, MR. S R RABHA
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, BTC
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 16-09-2026
On 15.09.2026 Court passed the following order:- “Ms. B. Bhuyan, learned senior counsel appearing for the BTC submits that the petitioner has challenged the Notification dated 10.10.2025 by which the Municipal Board & Urban Development Authority under the BTC has been dissolved with immediate effect. She submits that the said Notification however has been recalled/withdrawn vide Notification dated 16.02.2026 and therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous. She submits that the appointment of the petitioner as Chairman of the Kokrajhar Development Authority was by the earlier Government and was conterminous to the said Government in the BTC. Now since there is a new Government in place, nothing survives in the writ petition. Mr. P. Bhardwaj, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner however submits that he may be given 2(two) days time to seek instructions from his client. In view of above, list the matter on 16.09.2026 in the ‘For Referral to the Special Mediation Drive-Mediation ‘For the Nation’ column.” Today, Mr. P Bhardwaj, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the matter has become infructuous. In view of above, the writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
Ms. B Bhuyan, learned senior counsel as well as the learned Standing Counsel, BTC assisted by Mr. NR Sharma, learned counsel appears for the BTC. Interim order passed earlier stands vacated. JUDGE Comparing Assistant