Gauhati High Court

I.A.(Civil)/3171/2026 of THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS. Vs DEEPAK THAPA on 15 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010186152026 2026:GAU- AS:13693-DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3171/2026 THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT,DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06, DIST-

GAHC010186152026

2026:GAU-

AS:13693-DB

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3171/2026

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS.

REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT,DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06, DIST- KAMRUP M, ASSAM, PIN- 781006

2: THE CHIEF ENGINEER

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BUILDING

CHANDMARI

GUWAHATI

ASSAM. PIN-781003

3: THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

TINSUKIA DISTRICT TERRITORIAL BUILDING DIVISION

TINSUKIA

DISTRICT- TINSUKIA

ASSAM. PIN78100

VERSUS

DEEPAK THAPA

SON OF RAJAN THAPA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- BAJALTOLI, CIRCUIT

HOUSE, TINSUKIA, P.S. TINSUKIA, DIST. TINSUKIA, ASSAM. PIN-786125

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R DHAR, Advocate for the Respondent : ,

BEFORE

HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. ASHUTOSH KUMAR

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

16-09-2026 (Arun Dev Choudhury, J)

1. We have heard Mr. D. Nath, learned counsel for the applicants/appellants and Mr. R. Bora, learned counsel for the sole respondent/opposite party.

2. The present Interlocutory Application has been filed by the applicants/appellants seeking condonation of the delay of 11 days in preferring the connected Writ Appeal against the order dated 16.07.2026 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) No. 6825/2025.

3. Perused the averments made in the application.

4. After going through the averments made in the application, we are satisfied that good grounds have been assigned by the applicants/appellants for condoning the delay of 11 days in preferring the connected appeal.

5. We, therefore, condone the delay.

6. The Interlocutory Application stands disposed off.

7. Registry to process the connected appeal and, if the same is found defect free, list it on 27.11.2026 under the appropriate heading. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE

Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead