Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/1560/2024 of SANTANU DUTTA Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS on 15 September 2026
GAHC010047852024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1560/2024 SANTANU DUTTA S/O- BIREN KUMAR DUTTA, R/O- WARD NO. 10, AMGURI TOWN P.O. AMGURI, P.S. AMGURI, DISTRICT- SIVASAGAR, ASSAM- 785680 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM
GAHC010047852024
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/1560/2024
SANTANU DUTTA
S/O- BIREN KUMAR DUTTA, R/O- WARD NO. 10, AMGURI TOWN P.O.
AMGURI, P.S. AMGURI, DISTRICT- SIVASAGAR, ASSAM- 785680
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF EXCISE, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06
2:SHRI ADITYA VIKRAM YADAV
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CUM DISTRICT COLLECTOR
SIVASAGAR DISTRICT HEAD QUARTER
P.S. SIVASAGAR SADAR
P.O. SIVASAGAR
ASSAM
3:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF EXCISE
SIVASAGAR DISTRICT
P.S. SIVASAGAR SADAR
P.O. SIVASAGAR
ASSAM
4:THE EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE
SIVASAGAR
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFFICE
SIVASAGAR DISTRICT HEAD QUARTER
P.S. SIVASAGAR SADAR
P.O. SIVASAGAR
ASSAM
5:THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
AMGURI
P.S. AMGURI P.O. AMGURI DISTRICT- SIVASAGAR
ASSAM
6:THE INSPECTOR OF EXCISE
AMURI
P.S. AMGURI P.O. AMGURI DISTRICT- SIVASAGAR
ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B P BORAH, MR P J DUTTA,S J DUTTA,A KALITA
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, EXCISE DEPTT., GA, ASSAM
Page No.# 3/3
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 16.09.2026 Heard Mr. P. J. Dutta, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R. R. Gogoi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. R. R. Gogoi, learned Standing Counsel for the Excise Department as well as Ms. M. Barman, learned Government Advocate appearing for the State respondent. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has received instructions from his client not to press the instant writ petition and accordingly, seeks withdrawal of the same with liberty to file afresh. Prayer is allowed. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed on being withdrawn. JUDGE Comparing Assistant