Gauhati High Court
Bail Appln./2587/2026 of ABDUL HAMID AND ANR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 15 September 2026
GAHC010191802026 2026:GAU-AS:13737 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2587/2026 ABDUL HAMID AND ANR S/O- LATE SAYED ALI, R/O- SECONI BORHOLLA. P.S.- JAKHALABANDHA, DIST NAGAON, ASSAM. 2: RAFIKUL ISLAM S/O-LATE SAYED ALI
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010191802026
2026:GAU-AS:13737
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./2587/2026
ABDUL HAMID AND ANR
S/O- LATE SAYED ALI, R/O- SECONI BORHOLLA. P.S.- JAKHALABANDHA, DIST NAGAON, ASSAM.
2: RAFIKUL ISLAM
S/O-LATE SAYED ALI
R/O- SECONI BORHOLLA. P.S.- JAKHALABANDHA
DIST NAGAON
ASSA
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY P.P. ASSAM.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S M ABDULLAH P, MD IMRAN,MD R ISLAM,MS F
HUSSAIN
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
16.09.2026 Heard Ms. F. Hussain, learned counsel for the accused and Ms. S. H. Bora, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent.
Page No.# 2/2
2. It appears that vide order, dated 07.09.2026, the case diary of Jakhalabandha P.S. Case No. 66/2026, under Sections 196(1)(a)/299/3(5) of the BNS, 2023, read with Section 13(1) of the Assam Cattle Preservation Act, was called for.
3. However, Ms. Bora, learned APP, submits that she has not received the case diary and as per her instruction, the I.O. has submitted charge-sheet, being charge-sheet No. 55/2026, dated 30.08.2026, and as such, she submits that the scanned copy of the records may be called for.
4. At this stage, Ms. Hussain, learned counsel for the accused submits that the accused shall appear before the learned Trial Court and apply for regular bail and this bail application may be closed.
5. Accordingly, taking note of the submissions of the learned counsel for both the parties, this Court is inclined to close this application, by directing the accused to appear before the learned Trial Court and to apply for regular bail. And it is also provided that on such application being filed, the learned Trial Court shall consider the same in accordance with law.
6. In terms of the above, this bail application stands closed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant