Gauhati High Court
AB/2113/2026 of RANJAN BORDOLOI AND ANR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 15 September 2026
GAHC010184942026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2113/2026 RANJAN BORDOLOI AND ANR S/O GOKUL BORDOLOI, R/O VILLAGE- JOYRAPUR GAON, P.S.- SIVASAGAR, DISTRICT- SIVASAGAR, ASSAM 2: PARTHAJYOTI NAUKAKHYA S/O BINANDA SARMAH
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010184942026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/2113/2026
RANJAN BORDOLOI AND ANR
S/O GOKUL BORDOLOI, R/O VILLAGE- JOYRAPUR GAON, P.S.- SIVASAGAR, DISTRICT- SIVASAGAR, ASSAM
2: PARTHAJYOTI NAUKAKHYA
S/O BINANDA SARMAH
R/O BARHOITING
P.S.- SIVASAGAR
DISTRICT- SIVASAGAR
ASSA
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K BORUAH, MS. P BORAH,MS. M BHUYAN,MR. M ALAM
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
16.09.2026
1. Heard Mr. K. Boruah, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. M. P. Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor.
2. This petition under Section 482 BNSS is filed by the petitioner, namely, Ranjan Bordoloi and Parthajyoti Naukakhya, apprehending arrest in Page No.# 2/2 connection with Sivasagar P.S. Case No. 150/2026 registered u/s 117(2) and 109(1) of BNS.
3. The gist of the allegations in the FIR lodged by the brother-in-law of the victim is that on 28/7/26 in connection with some buying and preparation of meat, the petitioners assaulted him leading to serious injuries and undergoing treatment in ICU of Jorhat Medical College and fighting for life.
4. Mr. Goswami, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits after perusal of the case diary that investigation has revealed that the nature of the assault was serious in manner leading to significant injuries and that the person is still undergoing treatment in the ICU, JMCH. It is revealed there from that the petitioner is also required to undergo brain surgery.
5. In view of such circumstances, it may not be justified to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner and stands rejected at this stage.
6. Return the case diary.
7. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application stands allowed and disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant