Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/2178/2026 of CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Vs BABITA DEVI AND ANR. A on 15 September 2026
GAHC010207992022 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2178/2026 CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT DARE HOUSE 2ND FLOOR NO. 2 N.S.C. BOSE ROAD CHENNAI- 600001 AND ITS BRANCH
GAHC010207992022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2178/2026
CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT DARE HOUSE
2ND FLOOR
NO. 2 N.S.C. BOSE ROAD
CHENNAI- 600001 AND ITS BRANCH OFFICE AT AASTHA PLAZA
4TH FLOOR
OPPOSITE TO S.B. DEORAH COLLEGE
G.S. ROAD
GUWAHATI.
VERSUS
BABITA DEVI AND ANR. A
W/O UPENDRA BHAGAT
VILL.- NO. 1 RANI PUKHURI
P.O. AND P.S.- URIAMGHAT
DIST.- GOLAGHAT (ASSAM)
PIN- 785601.
2:ARCHANA DAS
W/O SANJIB DAS
WARD NO. 2 CHATIANI
P.O. AND P.S.- SARUPATHAR
PIN- 785601
DIST.- GOLAGHAT (ASSAM).
------------
Advocate for : MR. R GOSWAMI
Advocate for : MS. P BARUAH appearing for BABITA DEVI AND ANR. A
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 16.09.2026
1. Heard Mr. R. Goswami, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Ms. P. Baruah, learned counsel for the opposite party No. 1/claimant.
2. This interlocutory application under Order 41 Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, has been filed by the applicant/Insurance Company in connection with MFA No. 49/2026, praying for stay of execution of the impugned judgment and award dated 06.04.2022, passed by the learned Commissioner, Employee’s Compensation, Golaghat, in G.E.C. Case No. 9/2019 during the pendency of the connected MFA No. 49/2026.
3. The learned counsel for the claimant/opposite party No. 1 submits that she does not have any objection if the stay is granted, however, same should be subject to deposit of 50% of the awarded amount by the Insurance Company.
4. The learned counsel for the applicant/Insurance Company is agreeable to comply with the said condition.
5. As such, notice to opposite party No. 2 in this interlocutory application is waived and this interlocutory application is allowed.
6. The execution of impugned judgment and order dated 06.04.2022, passed by the learned Commissioner, Employee’s Compensation, Golaghat in G.E.C. Case No. 9/2019 shall remain stayed during the pendency of the connected MFA No. 49/2026, subject to deposit of 50% of the awarded amount by the applicant/Insurance Company before the Registry of this Court within a period of 6 weeks from the date of this order.
7. On such deposit being made, same shall be disbursed by the Registry to the claimant/opposite party No. 1 after proper verification on furnishing of an indemnity bond equivalent to the amount so disbursed.
8. This interlocutory application is accordingly disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant