Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/4997/2026 of FOKAR UDDIN AHMED ALIAS FAKAR UDDIN AHMED AND 74 ORS Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS on 14 September 2026
GAHC010191692026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4997/2026 FOKAR UDDIN AHMED ALIAS FAKAR UDDIN AHMED AND 74 ORS S/O ALLAL UDDIN 2: BABUL ALI S/O AKASH ALI 3: HABIBUR RAHMAN S/O ABDUL BAREK 4: SORHAB UDDIN S/O MAIN
GAHC010191692026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/4997/2026
FOKAR UDDIN AHMED ALIAS FAKAR UDDIN AHMED AND 74 ORS
S/O ALLAL UDDIN
2: BABUL ALI
S/O AKASH ALI
3: HABIBUR RAHMAN
S/O ABDUL BAREK
4: SORHAB UDDIN
S/O MAIN UDDIN
5: IKRAMUL HAQUE
S/O ALI HUSSAIN
6: AJADUL ISLAM
S/O APATAR ALI
7: RAFIKUL ISLAM
S/O ABDUL MALEK
8: GAFUR ALI
S/O AMAN ALI
9: FARIDUL ISLAM
S/O ALAL UDDIN
10: JALAL UDDIN
S/O AMIR ISLAM
11: MAJIT ALI
S/O ABDUL LATIF
12: SAIFUL ISLAM
S/O MALEK
13: MOTIBUR RAHMAN
S/O CHAMSUDDIN
14: ABDUL KALAM
S/O ABDUL HAMID
15: ABDUL RAHIM
S/O JALAL UDDIN
16: MAFIJ UDDIN
S/O CHAMCHADDIN AHMED
17: ABDUL MAJIT
S/O CHAMSUDDIN
18: MUSTAKIN ALI
S/O ABDUL ALI
19: MUBARAK ALI
S/O ABDUL ALI
20: MUSTAFA ALI
S/O ABDUL ALI
21: JUHUR ALI
S/O ISMAIL ALI
22: REKIBUR ALI
S/O AKASH ALI
23: HABIBUR RAHMAN
S/O ISMAIL ALI
24: CHAHERA KHATUN
C/O CHAHED ALI
25: MAJIBUR RAHMAN
S/O ISMAIL ALI
26: ABDUL RAFIK
S/O ABDUL MANNASH
27: SAFIKUL ISLAM
S/O ABDUL MANNASH
28: ABUL HUSSAIN
S/O MAGBUL HUSSAIN
29: CHOIDUR RAHMAN
S/O MANNASH
30: ABDUL KHALILUR
S/O PASAN ALI
31: HAMED ALI
S/O MAHAMMAD ALI
32: ASHRAF ALI
S/O MAHAMMAD ALI
33: ABDUL KHALEK
S/O HAMED ALI
34: ABDUL WAHED
S/O HAMED ALI
35: ABDUL BAREK
S/O HAMED ALI
36: ABDUL BAREK
S/O ABDUL HUSHIN
37: MOHIDUL ISLAM
S/O NEWAJ ALI
38: MEHBUB HUSSAIN
S/O MOKBUL HUSSAIN
39: SIRAJ HUSSAIN
S/O NUR MOHAMMAD
40: NAZIR HUSSAIN
S/O MAGBUL HUSSAIN
41: NURUL ISLAM
S/O HAJI MUKABUL HUSSAIN
42: ABDUL RAHIM
S/O MATALEB ALI
43: ABDUL RAHMAN
S/O HAJI MAKABUL RAHMAN
44: HORMUS ALI
S/O MUNNACH ALI
45: SARIFULLA FARUK
S/O ABDUL REJJAK
46: NURUL AMIN
S/O MAKABUL HUSSAIN
47: CHAIFUL ALI
S/O CHORAB ALI
48: HIFZUR RAHMAN
S/O AMINUR RAHMAN
49: NAJIBUR RAHMAN
S/O HAMEDA KHATUN
50: ATABUR RAHMAN
S/O AMINUR RAHMAN
51: MAKHAMEDUL HUSSAIN
S/O ASHRAF ALI
52: KHALILUR RAHMAN
S/O JAFAR ALI
53: INUJ ALI
S/O HUSSAIN ALI
54: ABDUL KALAM
S/O HAJIMAKABUL
55: ABDUL ROFIK
S/O ABDUL KACHEM
56: ABDUL KACHEM
S/O MANACH ALI
57: RAMJAN ALI
S/O ABDUL AJIJ
58: RAHUL AMIN
S/O MUKBUL HUSSAIN
59: FAIJUDDIN
S/O MR. JALAL UDDIN
60: SIRAJ ALI
S/O MABUL HUSSAIN
61: NUR MAHAMMAD HUSSAIN
S/O HAJIMAKABUL HUSSAIN
62: FAZLUR RAHMAN
S/O LT. AMINUR RAHMAN
63: RAFIK ALI
S/O MOGBUL HUSSAIN
64: ABDUL CHALAM
S/O HAJI ALI
65: NUR ISLAM
S/O SURHAB ALI
66: SAMSUL ALI
S/O CHORAB ALI
67: AHAMAD ALI
S/O JAHED ALI
68: CHURAHAB ALI
S/O JAYAMAT ALI
69: UBAIDULLAH FARUQUE
S/O ABDUL RAZZAK
70: ATIQUL ISLAM
S/O ABDUL KADIR
71: ARCHAB ALI
S/O JAYAMAT ALI
72: RASID ALI
S/O JOHUR ALI
73: ATIKUR RAHMAN
S/O MOHAMMAD AMINUR RAHMAN
74: FAZLUL KARIM
S/O AMINUR RAHMAN
75: MOHIDUL ISLAM
S/O CHURHAB ALI
ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF 9/6 KOILAMARI
P.O. AND P.S.- NORTH LAKHIMPUR
DISTRICT- LAKHIMPUR ASSAM
PIN-787051
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF
ASSAM, JANATA BHAWAN, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006.
2:THE SECRETARY
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPT
JANATA BHAWAN
DISPUR
GUWAHATI- 781006.
3:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
LAKHIMPUR
NORTH LAKHIMPUR
PO AND PS- NORTH LAKHIMPUR
DIST- LAKHIMPUR
PIN-787001
ASSAM.
4:THE CIRCLE OFFICER
NORTH LAKHIMPUR REVENUE CIRCLE
LAKHIMPUR
ASSAM-787001
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. Z KHALID, ARIF KHAN,MR. M H ALI
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, REVENUE
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 15-09-2026 Mr. M.H. Ali, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that certain inadvertent errors have crept in the writ petition. Therefore, the petitioners want to withdraw the writ petition, with liberty.
Mr. J. Handique, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the State respondents is in attendance. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Ali, learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal, with liberty, as sought for.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant