Gauhati High Court

Bail Appln./2701/2026 of SRI ANKIT DAS Vs STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR on 14 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010196582026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2701/2026 SRI ANKIT DAS SON OF LATE BIPUL DAS RESIDENT OF SAGOLPARA, BASISTHA P.S. BASISTHA DISTRICT KAMRUP M, ASSAM. VERSUS STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY P.P.

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010196582026

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : Bail Appln./2701/2026

SRI ANKIT DAS

SON OF LATE BIPUL DAS RESIDENT OF SAGOLPARA, BASISTHA P.S.

BASISTHA DISTRICT KAMRUP M, ASSAM.

VERSUS

STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR

REPRESENTED BY P.P. ASSAM

2:SMTI BHANU BORA SAIKIA

WIFE OF- AMIT SAIKIA R/O- LAKHARA

SGALPARA P.S.- BASISTHA DISTRICT- KAMRUP M

ASSA

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A BORUA, MR T GOGOI

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 15.09.2026 Heard Mr. A. Baruah, learned counsel for the petitioner and K.K. Parasar, learned Addl. PP for the State respondent.

2. This is an application under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 praying for regular bail to the petitioner namely Sri Ankit Das, who was arrested on 01.06.2026 in connection with Basistha P.S. Case No. 176/2026 (G.R. No. 2023/

Page No.# 2/2 2026) registered under Section 142 of the BNS, 2023, read with Section 4 of the POCSO Act, 2012.

3. The learned Addl. PP has submitted that he has received instruction from the I.O. that the case diary including the charge sheet has been sent to the concerned court only today and the statutory period of 90 days has is already over.

4. Having regard to the above and the fact that the petitioner was arrested on 01.06.2026, the petitioner is entitled to default bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail is allowed.

5. Accordingly, it is directed that the petitioner named above shall be released on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two securities of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge (POCSO), Kamrup (Metro), Guwahati in connection with the aforementioned case. It is provided that the petitioner shall appear before the I.O. for further investigation as and when called by the IO and shall not try to tamper with the evidence or hamper the investigation of the case, in any manner and shall not intimidate to any persons acquainted with the facts of the case.

6. The petition stands allowed.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead