Gauhati High Court
Bail Appln./2273/2026 of SHOMESH UDDIN AHMED Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 14 September 2026
GAHC010168342026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2273/2026 SHOMESH UDDIN AHMED S/O LATE S A AHMED, R/O WARD NO 9, AL AMIN NAGAR, BARPETA ROAD, PO AND PS BARPETA ROAD, DIST BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN 781315 VERSUS THE
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010168342026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./2273/2026
SHOMESH UDDIN AHMED
S/O LATE S A AHMED, R/O WARD NO 9, AL AMIN NAGAR, BARPETA ROAD, PO AND PS BARPETA ROAD, DIST BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN 781315
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR P BHARDWAJ, B PARASHAR,M RAHMAN,R C ALOM
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 15.09.2026 Heard Mr. P. Bharadwaj, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. This is an application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 whereby the petitioner, Shomesh Uddin Ahmed, has prayed for granting his bail after he was arrested in Barpeta Road P.S. Case No.86/2026
Page No.# 2/2 registered under Sections 3, 4, 5 and 7 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956. The allegations as reflected in the FIR is that one prostitution racket was being run at a particular hotel in Barpeta Road and the same was raided by the members of an Organization and some girls and boys found engaging in illicit activities. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the present petitioner is the owner of the building who had leased it out to the main accused and the same is also reflected in the grounds of arrest. The case has already been charge-sheeted and the main accused of the case has already been granted bail by the learned Court Below, i.e. the Additional Sessions Judge, FTC, Barpeta in Misc(Criminal) Bail Case No. 251/2026 dated 08.09.2026. The petitioner has been in custody since 45 days. Having regard to the period of detention, the prayer for bail is allowed. Accordingly, the petitioner named above shall be released on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned jurisdictional Magistrate/Court. Bail application stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant