Gauhati High Court
Cont.Cas(C)/200/2024 of DIPANJALI GOSWAMI Vs MAMATA HOJAI, AES on 13 September 2026
GAHC010078452024 2026:GAU-AS:13500 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/200/2024 DIPANJALI GOSWAMI WIFE OF GIRIN GOSWAMI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- OUTALA, P.O.- KENDUA, P.S.- BAIHATA CHARIALI, DISTRICT- KAMRUP, ASSAM, PIN
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010078452024
2026:GAU-AS:13500
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/200/2024
DIPANJALI GOSWAMI
WIFE OF GIRIN GOSWAMI,
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- OUTALA,
P.O.- KENDUA,
P.S.- BAIHATA CHARIALI,
DISTRICT- KAMRUP, ASSAM,
PIN -781121.
VERSUS
MAMATA HOJAI, AES
DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, ASSAM,
KAHILIPARA, GUWAHATI- 781019, ASSAM.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K N CHOUDHURY, MS N MAHANTA,N GAUTAM,MR. R M
DEKA
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. D SAIKIA, MR. U SARMA,MR. N J KHATANIAR
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
14-09-2026
1. Heard Mr. R.M. Deka, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S.M.T. Chistie, Page No.# 2/2 learned counsel for the respondents.
2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the parties that pursuant to the judgment and order dated 12.04.2023, passed in WP(C) No. 1546/2022 and other connected writ petitions, so far relating to the present petitioner, a Speaking Order dated 14.09.2026 has been passed.
3. Since the judgment and order dated 12.04.2023 (supra) has already been complied with, the present contempt petition stands closed.
4. Copy of the Speaking Order dated 14.09.2026 (supra) be furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner.
5. It is needless to say that in the event, the petitioner is aggrieved by the Speaking Order, she shall be at liberty to approach the appropriate forum for redressal of her grievance.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant