Gauhati High Court
Crl.L.P./12/2026 of SRI HITESH BARUAH Vs RANJIT KUMAR DAS on 13 September 2026
GAHC010078352026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.L.P./12/2026 SRI HITESH BARUAH SON OF LATE DEBENDRA NARAYAN BARUAH, RO. VILL. BASHBARI, PS. AND DIST. BONGAIGAON, ASSAM, PIN- 783392. VERSUS RANJIT KUMAR DAS SON OF
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010078352026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Crl.L.P./12/2026
SRI HITESH BARUAH
SON OF LATE DEBENDRA NARAYAN BARUAH, RO. VILL. BASHBARI, PS.
AND DIST. BONGAIGAON, ASSAM, PIN- 783392.
VERSUS
RANJIT KUMAR DAS
SON OF TILOK CH DAS, RO. VILL. RAGHUNANDANPUR, PO. BOITAMARI, PS. ABHAYAPURI, DIST. BONGAIGAON, ASSAM, PIN- 783389.
PRESENT ADDRESS-
DEURIPARA (NEAR SCIENCE COLLEGE/ MAGISTRATE COLONY), P/O. AND
AND DIST. BONGAIGAON, ASSAM, PIN-783380.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS R SAHA, MR. B J MUKHERJEE
Advocate for the Respondent : MR G BHARADWAJ, MR B DEORI
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
14.09.2026 Heard Mr. B. J. Mukherjee, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. A. Khanikar, learned counsel or the respondent. The petitioner is seeking leave to file criminal appeal against acquittal aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 18.02.2026 passed by the learned Additional CJM, Bonaigaon in NICR Case No. 195/23 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Page No.# 2/2 Learned counsel for the submits that the applicant was the complainant and he contends that perhaps the acquittal was not justified and therefore, he may be allowed to prosecute this appeal. Mr. Khanikar learned counsel submits that there is no infirmity in the impugned judgment passed by the learned trial court. I have given my consideration in the matter. In exercise of powers under 419(4) of BNSS, the leave is hereby granted to prefer the aforementioned criminal appeal. I.A is accordingly disposed of. Registry is directed to register the connected appeal and list the matter for admission.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant