Gauhati High Court

I.A.(Crl.)/215/2025 of SWMLA BORGOYARY AND 5 OTHERS Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 13 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010042282025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/215/2025 SWMLA BORGOYARY AND 5 OTHERS S/O. KACHIRAM BORGOYARY, VILL.- DAKHINGAON, P/S.RUNIKHATA, DIST.- CHIRANG, ASSAM 2: UKIL BASUMATARY S/O. LT. TOYLA

GAHC010042282025

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/215/2025

SWMLA BORGOYARY AND 5 OTHERS

S/O. KACHIRAM BORGOYARY, VILL.- DAKHINGAON, P/S.RUNIKHATA, DIST.- CHIRANG, ASSAM

2: UKIL BASUMATARY

S/O. LT. TOYLA BASUMATARY

VILL.- DAKHINGAON

P/S.RUNIKHATA

DIST.- CHIRANG

ASSAM

3: KACHIRAM BORGOYARY

S/O. LT. GEBLA BORGOYARY

VILL.- DAKHINGAON

P/S.RUNIKHATA

DIST.- CHIRANG

ASSAM

4: PRASENJIT BORGOYARY

S/O. LT. ARUN BORGOYARY

VILL.- DAKHINGAON

P/S.RUNIKHATA

DIST.- CHIRANG

ASSAM

5: GWSWM WARY

W/O. NONDOLAL WARY

VILL.- DAKHINGAON

P/S.RUNIKHATA

DIST.- CHIRANG

ASSAM

6: REBEKA WARY

W/O. LT. SANSUMA WARY

VILL.- DAKHINGAON

P/S.RUNIKHATA

DIST.- CHIRANG

ASSA

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM

REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM

2:RIJAM NARZARY

S/O. LT. SARAT NAZARY

R/O. VILL.- DAKHINGAON

P/S.RUNIKHATA

DIST.- CHIRANG

ASSA

Advocate for the Petitioner : S K DAS, MR. M BISWAS,J SINGPHO,MR. A TALUKDAR

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MR SOHAING(R2),MS. E R BAISHYA(R2),MR. J

KALITA(R2)

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NCHUMBEMO MOZHUI

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

14.09.2026 (M. Zothankhuma, J) Heard Mr. M. Biswas, learned counsel for the applicant, who submits that there is a delay of 75 days in filing the appeal against the conviction of the applicant under Section 120B/448/364/302/34 IPC. Ms. A. Begum, learned Additional Public Prosecutor and Mr. J. Kalita, learned counsel for the respondent no.2 submit that they have got no objection to the delay being condoned.

Accordingly, the delay of 75 days is condoned. Registry to register the connected appeal and list the same. I.A. is accordingly allowed and disposed of.

JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead