Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/5422/2024 of PANCHANAN DUTTA Vs THE NORTH EASTERN DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION LIMITED AND 2 ORS on 13 September 2026
GAHC010218362024 2026:GAU-AS:13471 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5422/2024 PANCHANAN DUTTA S/O LATE ANANDA RAM DUTTA, R/O LONPURIA GAON, P.O.- KALOO GAON, P.S.-AMGURI, DIST- SIVASAGAR, ASSAM VERSUS THE NORTH EASTERN
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010218362024
2026:GAU-AS:13471
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/5422/2024
PANCHANAN DUTTA
S/O LATE ANANDA RAM DUTTA, R/O LONPURIA GAON, P.O.- KALOO
GAON, P.S.-AMGURI, DIST- SIVASAGAR, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE NORTH EASTERN DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION LIMITED
AND 2 ORS
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR (CMD), NEDFI HOUSE, G.S. ROAD, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006
2:THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER
PFD (SAMC)
NORTH EASTERN DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION LIMITED
NEDFI HOUSE
G.S. ROAD
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-781006
3:THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER
NORTH EASTERN DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION LIMITED
NEDFI HOUSE
G.S. ROAD
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-78100
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R PHUKAN, MR. R MAHANTA,MR. P TALUKDAR
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. S DUTTA (R-1,2,3), MR K KASHYAB(R-1,2,3)
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 14.09.2026 None appears for the petitioner despite the matter being called twice. Mr. S. Dutta, learned counsel for the respondents is present. It seems that on 14.07.2026 also, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. However, on the last occasion, i.e., 17.08.2026, the petitioner was represented and on the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the matter was fixed today to enable the petitioner to file rejoinder. However, despite the matter being fixed today, the rejoinder has not been filed. It is also to be noted that despite the matter having been called twice today, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It further appears that the names of the learned counsel for the petitioner are reflected in the cause list. That being so, the matter stands dismissed for non-prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant