Gauhati High Court
Cont.Cas(C)/729/2019 of RINKU GOGAI Vs PRATAP SINGHA on 13 September 2026
GAHC010301072019 2026:GAU-AS:13493 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/729/2019 RINKU GOGAI S/O- SORAT GOGAI, VILL AND P.O. LAKHIPATHAR, DIST. TINSUKIA, ASSAM VERSUS PRATAP SINGHA THE COMMANDANT, 21ST A.P.(IR)BN,
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010301072019
2026:GAU-AS:13493
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/729/2019
RINKU GOGAI
S/O- SORAT GOGAI, VILL AND P.O. LAKHIPATHAR, DIST. TINSUKIA, ASSAM
VERSUS
PRATAP SINGHA
THE COMMANDANT, 21ST A.P.(IR)BN, KATLICHERRA, DIST.- HAILAKANDI, ASSAM, 788001
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR F Z MAZUMDER, MR S GAUTAM,MR B M DEKA,MR. K M
MAHANTA,MR K K MAHANTA,MR. J LASKAR
Advocate for the Respondent : MR H SARMA, ADDL. SR. GA, ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
14.09.2026
1. Heard Ms. N. Begum, learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. The present contempt petition is filed alleging willful and deliberate violation of the order dated 13.06.2019 passed in WP(C)/3911/2019.
Page No.# 2/2
3. The aforesaid order dated 13.06.2019 is quoted herein below:- “Heard Mr. F. Z. Mazumder, learned counsel for the petitioner. Issue notice, returnable within 3 (three) weeks. Mr. D. Nath, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of all the respondents. Petitioner may be paid the subsistence allowance during the period of his suspension. List the matter again on 06.08.2019.”
4. Thereafter, the writ petition was dismissed on withdrawal under its order dated 01.06.2022, the same is quoted herein below:- “Mr. K. M. Mahanta, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be allowed to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh. Mr. S. S. Roy, learned counsel appears for the all respondents. Prayer is allowed. The Writ Petition is dismissed on withdrawal as prayed for, with liberty to file afresh”.
5. In view of the aforesaid, nothing survives to the adjudicated in the present contempt petition.
6. Accordingly, this contempt petition stands closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant