Gauhati High Court
Cont.Cas(C)/487/2026 of PURNIMA DEVI AND ANR Vs DIBAKAR NATH, IAS AND ANR on 13 September 2026
GAHC010195922026 2026:GAU-AS:13558 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/487/2026 PURNIMA DEVI AND ANR W/O LATE PURENDRA CHANDRA NATH, R/O VILL- ALENGMARI, P.O.- LAKHIGANJ, P.S.- BILASIPARA, DIST- DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN- 783345
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010195922026
2026:GAU-AS:13558
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/487/2026
PURNIMA DEVI AND ANR
W/O LATE PURENDRA CHANDRA NATH, R/O VILL- ALENGMARI, P.O.- LAKHIGANJ, P.S.- BILASIPARA, DIST- DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN- 783345
2: BIBHUJIT NATH
S/O LATE PURENDRA CHANDRA NATH
R/O VILL- ALENGMARI
P.O.- LAKHIGANJ
P.S.- BILASIPARA
DIST- DHUBRI
ASSAM
PIN- 78334
VERSUS
DIBAKAR NATH, IAS AND ANR
DISTRICT COMMISSIONER, DHUBRI, DIST- DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN- 783301
2:SARI LALRUOTKIM LUNGTAU
ACS
CIRCLE OFFICER
BILASIPARA REVENUE CIRCLE
DIST- DHUBRI
ASSAM
PIN- 78334
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR M A ISLAM, MR J I MONDAL
Advocate for the Respondent : ,
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
14.09.2026
Heard Mr. M.A. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Islam has submitted that since the petitioner has already filed an application seeking delivery of the notified public service, ‘Composite Land Sale Transfer’ on 24.03.2026. As the said service has not been delivered by the Designated Public Servant till date, the petitioner will first exhaust the remedy of statutory appeals, as provided by the provisions of the Assam Right to Public Service Act, 2012, as amended. In that view of the matter, the petitioner wants to withdraw the contempt petition, at this stage. In view of the submission made by Mr. Islam that the petitioner will prefer remedy of statutory appeal under the Assam Right to Public Service Act, this contempt petition is closed at this stage.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant