Gauhati High Court
AB/2046/2026 of SRI PANKAJ DAS Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 13 September 2026
GAHC010183082026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2046/2026 SRI PANKAJ DAS S/O LATE BENUDHAR DAS ALIAS BINA DAS, RESIDENT OF BIJULIBARI, P.O. MAROI, P.S. SIPAJHAR, DIST. DARRANG, ASSAM PIN 784145 VERSUS THE STATE OF
GAHC010183082026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/2046/2026
SRI PANKAJ DAS
S/O LATE BENUDHAR DAS ALIAS BINA DAS, RESIDENT OF BIJULIBARI, P.O. MAROI, P.S. SIPAJHAR, DIST. DARRANG, ASSAM PIN 784145
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A A R KARIM, MD S A MONDAL,MR S RAHMAN,MS. R
BEGOM
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 14.09.2026 Heard Mr. A. A. R. Karim, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K.K. Parashar, learned Addl. PP for the State respondent.
2. This is an application under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 praying for anticipatory bail to the petitioner namely Sri Pankaj Das, who is apprehending arrest in connection with Baihata Chariali P.S. Case No. 166/2026 registered under Sections 303(2)/ 317(2)/ 3(5) of the BNS, 2023, read with Sections 13(1) of the ACP Act and 11(1)(a/ 11(1)(d) of PCA Act.
3. The case diary as called for has been received.
4. As per the allegation, one vehicle transporting 26 numbers of cattle was intercepted by the police on 25.07.2026 and the driver of the vehicle was apprehended and during interrogation, he stated that he was funded by two persons one of whom is he present petitioner.
5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not the owner of the vehicle or cattle and nor he is handyman and he is not connected with the alleged offences in any manner.
6. The learned Addl. PP on perusal of the case diary submits that besides the above, there appears to be no other material against the petitioner.
7. Having regard to the above, the prayer for bail is allowed. In the event of arrest, it is directed that the petitioner named above be released on pre arrest bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two securities of like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority in connection with the aforementioned case. It is provide that the petitioner shall appear before the I.O. within ten days from today and shall not induce or intimidate to any persons acquainted with the facts of the case, in any manner.
8. The petition stands allowed.
9. Return the case diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant