Gauhati High Court

AB/2202/2026 of RABBUL ISLAM AND 5 ORS. Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 13 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010191082026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2202/2026 RABBUL ISLAM AND 5 ORS. S/O. MANUR UDDIN, R/O. VILLAGE-FUTALJAR, P.S.-RUPAHIHAT, DIST.- NAGAON, ASSAM 2: MANUR UDDIN S/O. RUSTUM ALI R/O. FUTALJAR

GAHC010191082026

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : AB/2202/2026

RABBUL ISLAM AND 5 ORS.

S/O. MANUR UDDIN, R/O. VILLAGE-FUTALJAR, P.S.-RUPAHIHAT, DIST.- NAGAON, ASSAM

2: MANUR UDDIN

S/O. RUSTUM ALI

R/O. FUTALJAR

P.S.-RUPAHIHAT

DIST.-NAGAON

ASSAM.

3: ASIA KHATUN

W/O. MANUR UDDIN

R/O. FUTALJAR

P.S.-RUPAHIHAT

DIST.-NAGAON

ASSAM

4: BILLAL UDDIN

S/O. MANUR UDDIN

R/O. FUTALJAR

P.S.-RUPAHIHAT

DIST.-NAGAON

ASSAM.

5: RASIDA KHATUN

W/O. BILLAL UDDIN

R/O. FUTALJAR

P.S.-RUPAHIHAT

DIST.-NAGAON

ASSAM

6: MABIYA KHATUN @ MABIA BEGUM

D/O. MANUR UDDIN

R/O. FUTALJAR

P.S.-RUPAHIHAT

DIST.-NAGAON

ASSAM

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM

REP BY THE PP, ASSAM

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M A SHEIKH, MR. S A WASI,MS F INTAZ

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 14-09-2026 Heard Mr. M.A Sheikh, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. D.P. Goswami, learned Addl. P.P appearing for the State. Invoking Section 482 BNSS, the petitioners (six in number), who are stated to be family members of the complainant through marriage. They have preferred this anticipatory bail application in connection with CR Case No. 948/2025, pending before the learned JMFC, Nagaon u/s 85/296/3(5) of BNS. It is submitted that the immediate cause for apprehension is the notice issued for their appearance before the learned court. Although, the specified date has passed, they wish to appear and co-operate with the trial. The gist of the allegations in the complaint pertains to Section 85 BNSS (cruelty and demand of dowry).

Upon considering the matter, the anticipatory bail petition is allowed. Accordingly, the petitioners shall appear before the learned court below within 10 days. Upon their appearance, they shall be released on bail of ₹20,000/- each with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned JMFC, Nagaon subject to the conditions that they shall co-operate with the trial and shall not tamper with evidence. The learned court would be at liberty to impose any other conditions, if it deems necessary. Anticipatory bail petition stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead