Gauhati High Court

I.A.(Crl.)/947/2026 of AMLAN JYOTI BHUYAN Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR on 13 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010200302026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/947/2026 AMLAN JYOTI BHUYAN S/O SRI HIRANYA KUMAR BHUYAN, R/O SWASTIK CITY, FLAT 1A, BHAGADUTTAPUR, KAHILIPARA, GUWAHATI - 781019, KAMRUP (M), ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF

GAHC010200302026

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/947/2026

AMLAN JYOTI BHUYAN

S/O SRI HIRANYA KUMAR BHUYAN, R/O SWASTIK CITY, FLAT 1A, BHAGADUTTAPUR, KAHILIPARA, GUWAHATI - 781019, KAMRUP (M), ASSAM.

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR

REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM

2:UGRESH KUMAR

GENERAL MANAGER

ASSAM GRAMIN VIKASH BANK

HEAD OFFICE ADAMS PLAZA

G.S. ROAD

GUWAHATI

DISTRICT- KAMRUP (M)

ASSAM

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A GANGULY, MR. DHANANJAY TALUKDAR,MR.

TAPOBRAT CHHETRI

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MR. A DHANUKA,MR. A GANGULY

Linked Case : Crl.Pet./210/2024

AMLAN JYOTI BHUYAN

S/O SRI HIRANYA KUMAR BHUYAN

R/O SWASTIK CITY

FLAT 1A

BHAGADUTTAPUR

KAHILIPARA

GUWAHATI-781019

KAMRUP (M)

ASSAM

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR

REP. BY THE PP

ASSAM

2:UGRESH KUMAR

GENERAL MANAGER

ASSAM GRAMIN VIKASH BANK

HEAD OFFICE ADAMS PLAZA

G.S. ROAD

GUWAHATI

DIST. KAMRUP (M)

ASSAM

------------

Advocate for : MR. S K JAIN

Advocate for : PP

ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 14.09.2026 Heard Mr. A. Ganguly, learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the State respondent. Also heard the learned counsel for the informant.

2. This application has been filed seeking correction of the order dated 09.09.2026, passed in the connected Criminal Petition No. 210/2024.

3. In the last pargraph of the said order, it has been reflected that the amount has been returned by the petitioner whereas the amount i.e. the borrowed money has been returned by the borrowers to the bank and accordingly correction is sought.

4. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, the aforesaid last pargraph of the order dated 09.09.2026 stands corrected and the same shall read as follows:- “As regards the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the amount i.e. the borrowed money has been returned by the borrowers, the learned counsel for the informant shall obtain instructions.”

5. This order shall form a part of the order dated 09.04.2026, passed in Criminal Petition 210/ 2024.

6. The I.A. stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead