Gauhati High Court
AB/1480/2026 of ABDUL AZIZ Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 13 September 2026
GAHC010132712026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1480/2026 ABDUL AZIZ SON OF KARIM ALI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE HALDHIA GAON, PO GHUGUBARI, PS KALGACHIA, DISTRICT BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN 781319 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010132712026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/1480/2026
ABDUL AZIZ
SON OF KARIM ALI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE HALDHIA GAON, PO
GHUGUBARI, PS KALGACHIA, DISTRICT BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN 781319
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : R AMIN, S K RAHMATULLAH
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 14-09-2026 Heard Mr. R. Amin, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. M.P Goswami, learned Addl. P.P appearing for the State. Apprehending arrest in connection with Kalgachia PS Case No. 54/2026, under Sections 318(4)/316(2) of the BNS read with Section 14 of the Game and Page No.# 2/2 Betting Act, this application under Section 482 of the BNSS, is preferred by applicant namely, Abdul Aziz, for grant of pre-arrest bail. It is to be noted here that the above noted case has been registered on the basis of one FIR lodged by S.I Jitul Das, on 31.05.2026. The petitioner was granted interim bail on 28.07.2026 with conditions. The Case Diary has been received and the learned Additional PP, Mr. Goswami, confirms that pursuant to the grant of interim, the petitioner has appeared before the I.O and his statement has been recorded. It is submitted that there are materials against the petitioner with regard to involvement in IPL betting, which violates the provisions of Assam Game and Betting Act, 1970. Though, the investigation has revealed implications against the petitioner, nevertheless, considering his co-operation rendered to the investigation, it may not be necessary to cancel his interim bail. Therefore, the said bail is made absolute, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall co- operate with the remaining investigation; he shall not tamper or hamper with evidence; and shall not indulge in any activities violative of Assam Games and Betting Act, 1970. Return the Case Diary. Bail application stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant