Gauhati High Court
Bail Appln./2379/2026 of KABIR AHMED CHOUDHURY Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR on 13 September 2026
GAHC010166322026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2379/2026 KABIR AHMED CHOUDHURY S/O LATE SAUQAT ALI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE S A CHOUDHURY LANE NAGATILLAM P.S. SILCHAR DIST. CACHARASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010166322026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2379/2026 KABIR AHMED CHOUDHURY S/O LATE SAUQAT ALI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE S A CHOUDHURY LANE NAGATILLAM P.S. SILCHAR DIST. CACHARASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM 2:SULTANA BEGUM BARBHUIYA WIFE OF FAIZ UDDIN LASKAR PERMANENT RESIDENT OF SUNDARI PART I P.S. KACHUDARA DIST. CACHAR ASSAM AND PRESENTLY RESIDING AT PESKAR JANGAL KANAKPUR PART-I P.S. SILCHAR DIST. CACHAR ASSAM
VILL- ALOMKHANI THAMUA P.S. NILAMBAZAR DIST. SRIBHUMI ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H R CHOUDHURY, Z HUSSAIN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, DARAK ULLAH, AMICUS CURIAE (R-2)
Page No.# 2/2 :: BEFORE :: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA O R D E R
14.09.2026
Heard Mr. H.R. Choudhury, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Bhaskar Sarma, the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam representing Respondent No.1. Mr. D. Ullah, the learned Amicus Curiae appears for the Respondent No.2.
2. This is an application under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in respect of Special (P) Case No.105/2025 pending in the court of learned Addl. Sessions Judge (POCSO), Cachar at Silchar.
3. The allegation brought against the present petitioner in this case is a serious one. I have gone through the evidence of the victim girl.
4. Let the trial court examine the medical witness. After that, the bail application of the petitioner shall be considered again. With the aforesaid direction, the present bail application is closed and disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant