Gauhati High Court

I.A.(Civil)/1978/2026 of PANKAJ KALITA Vs SRI ANURAG GOEL on 13 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010119232026 2026:GAU-AS:13468 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1978/2026 PANKAJ KALITA S/O-LATE ARANI KALITA PRODUCER/DIRECTOR AK CINE VISION FLAT NO. D/7 BLOCK-D SARAIGHAT HOUSING COMPLEX HATIGAON-BHETAPARA ROAD

GAHC010119232026

2026:GAU-AS:13468

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1978/2026

PANKAJ KALITA

S/O-LATE ARANI KALITA

PRODUCER/DIRECTOR

AK CINE VISION

FLAT NO. D/7

BLOCK-D

SARAIGHAT HOUSING COMPLEX

HATIGAON-BHETAPARA ROAD

BARSAJAI

GUWAHATI

DIST.-KAMRUP M

ASSAM-781028

VERSUS

SRI ANURAG GOEL

IAS

PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL SECRETARIAT

BODOFA NWGWR

KOKRAJHAR

BTR

ASSAM-783370.

2:SRI AKASH DEEP

IAS

PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL SECRETARIAT

BODOFA NWGWR

KOKRAJHAR

BTR

ASSAM-783370

3:MR MUKESH CHANDRA SAHU

THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL

BODOFA NWGWR

KOKRAJHAR

BTR

ASSAM-783370.

------------

Advocate for : MR. A MANNAF

Advocate for : MS. N CHOUDHURY appearing for SRI ANURAG GOEL

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 14.09.2026 Heard Mr. A. Mannaf, learned counsel appearing for the applicant. Also heard Mr. N. R. Sharma, learned Standing Counsel, BTC for proposed respondent No. 3. By way of this application, the applicant seeks impleadment of the new incumbent, namely, Mr. Mukesh Chandra Sahu, Principal Secretary, Bodoland Territorial Council (BTC), Kokrajhar, in terms of the order dated 06.05.2026 passed by this Court in the connected Cont.Cas(C) No. 787/2022. It appears that the applicant had filed the aforesaid contempt petition alleging willful and deliberate violation of the order dated 17.12.2021 passed by this Court in WP(C) No. 6130/2021. It further appears that when the contempt petition was taken up on 06.05.2026, a submission was made before this Court that the then contemnor No. 3, namely, Shri. Akash Deep, was no longer discharging the function as Principal Secretary, Bodoland Territorial Council, Kokrajahr. In view thereof, this Court allowed the applicant to implead the newly appointed incumbent, namely, Mr. Mukesh Chandra Sahu, who is presently holding the post of Principal Secretary, Bodoland Territorial Council. Accordingly, the present application has been filed. Mr. N. R. Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the proposed contemnor/respondent No. 3, submits that he has no objection to the impleadment of Mr. Mukesh Chandra Sahu as contemnor No. 3 in the connected contempt petition. I have given my prudent consideration to the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties and have perused the material available on record. Having regard to the fact and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that, for the effective adjudication of the connected contempt petition, the present incumbent holding the post of Principal Secretary, Bodoland Territorial Council, is required to be impleaded. Accordingly, the prayer made in this application stands allowed. Mr. Mukesh Chandra Sahu, Principal Secretary, Bodoland Territorial Council, Kokrajhar, stands impleaded as contemnor No. 3 in Cont.Cas(C) No. 787/2022. Let an amended cause-title be submitted before the Registry for doing the needful. The interlocutory application accordingly stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead