Gauhati High Court
Bail Appln./2521/2026 of SRI PARESH CHOUDHURY Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 13 September 2026
GAHC010183362026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2521/2026 SRI PARESH CHOUDHURY S/O DINA CHOUDHURY, R/O VILLAGE-CHANAKA, P.S.-MAYONG, DISTRICT-MORIGAON, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP,
GAHC010183362026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./2521/2026
SRI PARESH CHOUDHURY
S/O DINA CHOUDHURY, R/O VILLAGE-CHANAKA, P.S.-MAYONG, DISTRICT-MORIGAON, ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H P GUWALA, S FAZIL,S SATNAMI
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 14-09-2026
Heard Mr. H.P Guwala, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. M.P Goswami, learned Addl. P.P appearing for the State. Invoking under Section 483 BNSS, the petitioner namely, Paresh Choudhury, is seeking regular bail in connection with Mayong PS Case No.
53/2024 u/s 87/127(2)/64(1)/351(2) BNS, 2023. The petitioner was arrested on 20.06.2024. The FIR dated 15.06.2024 lodged by the victim woman herself with allegations of abuse and forceful physical relationship, including threatening. The learned counsel submits that the petitioner and the victim were having a love affair and subsequently, due to some misunderstanding, an FIR has been lodged and the petitioner is languishing in custody. It is submitted by the prosecution that investigation is already complete. The learned Additional PP, Mr. Goswami, submits that in the said statement, she has implicated the petitioner and therefore, prosecution is opposed to the bail. Scanned Case Diary is available. Perused the statement of the victim under section 183 BNSS. In her statement under section 183 statement, she has not stated about a love affair. In view of the length of detention and completion of investigation, I am inclined to allow this bail petition, subject however to suitable conditions. In such view of the matter, the petitioner is allowed to go on bail on furnishing a bail bond of ₹40,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned learned court, (CJM Morigaon), and subject to the conditions that:
(i) He shall be available for trial when if one commences.
(ii) He shall not hamper or tamper with evidence.
(iii) He shall not in any manner intimidate, harass, or harm the informant/victim girl in any manner. Violation of the bail conditions will entail cancellation of the bail as per law.
The bail application stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant