Gauhati High Court
MACApp./148/2026 of SMTI BHANU SAIKIA BORAH AND ANR Vs SRI ANJAN GOSWAMI AND ANR on 11 September 2026
GAHC010288272025 2026:GAU-AS:13591 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : MACApp./148/2026 SMTI BHANU SAIKIA BORAH AND ANR WIFE OF LATE NETRA BORAH VILLAGE KETEKIBARI PO KETEKIBARI PS TEZPUR DISTRICT SONITPUR ASSAM 2: SRI BHASKAR BORAH
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010288272025
2026:GAU-AS:13591
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : MACApp./148/2026
SMTI BHANU SAIKIA BORAH AND ANR
WIFE OF LATE NETRA BORAH VILLAGE KETEKIBARI PO KETEKIBARI PS
TEZPUR DISTRICT SONITPUR ASSAM
2: SRI BHASKAR BORAH
SON OF LATE NETRA BORAH VILLAGE KETEKIBARI PO KETEKIBARI PS
TEZPUR DISTRICT SONITPUR ASSA
VERSUS
SRI ANJAN GOSWAMI AND ANR
SON OF SRI NIRANJAN GOSWAMI VILLAGE GAHAN NAGAR MAZGAON
PO TEZPUR PS TEZPUR DISTRICT SONITPUR ASSAM 784001
2:DIVISIONAL MANAGER NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY
TEZPUR BRANCH SONITPUR ASSAM 78400
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K BHATTACHARJEE, S KHAN,MR. A U AHMED,MS. P
BORDOLOI,ABBASH U AHMED
Advocate for the Respondent : , MR A KHANIKAR(R1),MS L SHARMA(R2),MR. SHYAM
SHARMA(R2)
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
12.09.2026 Ms. Bhanu Saikia Borah and Mr. B. Borah, the appellant/claimants before the learned Tribunal, along with Mr. A. U. Ahmed, learned counsel, are present. Ms. Hena Haflongbar, the representative of the New India Assurance Company Limited, is present. It has been submitted that the claim has been settled for an additional amount of Rs. 2,10,000/-, over and above the original awarded amount of Rs. 7,36,069/-. The claimants have already received an amount of Rs. 7,36,069/- and the additional amount of Rs. 2,10,000/- would now be paid by the insurance company. The claimant No. 2, Mr. B. Borah, has submitted that he would have no objection if the enhanced amount is now credited to the account of his mother, namely, Ms. Bhanu Saikia Borah, who is the other claimant. Accordingly, Ms. Bhanu Saikia Borah shall furnish her bank details to the insurance company to which the enhanced amount shall now be credited. MAC Appeal is closed on settlement. TCR be returned. A copy of the settlement shall be kept on record. JUDGE Comparing Assistant