Gauhati High Court

I.A.(Crl.)/913/2026 of SRI PRADIP DAS Vs STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR. on 9 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010179322026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/913/2026 SRI PRADIP DAS S/O - LT. DOMBORU DAS, R/O - MISAMARI, MAJULI, P.S. - MAJULI, DIST. - MAJULI, ASSAM. VERSUS STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR. REPRESENTED BY THE

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010179322026

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/913/2026

SRI PRADIP DAS

S/O - LT. DOMBORU DAS, R/O - MISAMARI, MAJULI, P.S. - MAJULI, DIST. - MAJULI, ASSAM.

VERSUS

STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR.

REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GOVT. OF ASSAM.

2:SMT PUJA DAS

W/O - BHUPEN DAS

R/O - JUGI KOIBORTO

MAJULI P.S. - MAJULI

DIST. - MAJULI ASSA

Advocate for the Petitioner : A SARMA,

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : ST.Rev./0/0

SRI PRADIP DAS

S/O - LT. DOMBORU DAS

R/O - MISAMARI

MAJULI

P.S. - MAJULI

DIST. - MAJULI ASSAM.

VERSUS

STATE OF ASSAM

REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

GOVT. OF ASSAM

Page No.# 2/2

2:SMT PUJA DAS

W/O- BHUPEN DAS

R/O- JUGI KOIBORTO

MAJULI P.S. - MAJULI

DIST. - MAJULI ASSAM.

------------

Advocate for : ANUSMITA SARMA

Advocate for : appearing for STATE OF ASSAM

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA

HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE HELEN DAWNGLIANI

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 10.09.2026 (M. Zothankhuma, J) Heard Ms. A. Sarma, learned counsel for the applicant, who submits that there is a delay of 60 days in filing the appeal against the conviction of the appellant under Section 87 BNSS and Section 6 of the POCSO Act. Ms. A. Begum, learned Addl. PP submits that she has got no objection to the delay being condoned. Accordingly, the delay of 60 days is condoned. Registry to register the connected appeal and list the same accordingly. The IA is accordingly disposed of.

JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead