Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/2825/2026 of SBI GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD Vs SRI DHIRAJ DAS AND 2 ORS. on 8 September 2026
GAHC010173142026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2825/2026 SBI GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD JUNCTION OF WESTERN EXPRESS HIGHWAY ANDHERI KURLA ROAD ANDHERI EAST MUMBAI-400069 REGIONAL OFFICE AT 4TH FLOOR B BLOCK APEEJAY
GAHC010132072026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : : I.A.(Civil)/2848/2026
SMT BHANU PRABHA DAS
W/O LATE PARESH CH. DAS
R/O BATA BUILDING
MALIGAON CHARIALI
GUWAHATI
P.S.- JALUKBARI
DIST.- KAMRUP M
ASSAM
PIN- 781012
VERSUS
ANIL CHOUDHURY
S/O LATE BABUL CHOUDHURY
R/O TETELIA
NEAR GANESH MANDIR
P.S.- JALUKBARI
DIST.- KAMRUP M
ASSAM
PIN- 781011
------------
Advocate for : MR. K KALITA
Advocate for : MR. A GANGULY appearing for ANIL CHOUDHURY
Main Case : FAO/42/2026
ANIL CHOUDHURY
S/O LATE BABUL CHOUDHURY, R/O TETELIA, NEAR GANESH MANDIR, P.S.- JALUKBARI, DIST.- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, PIN- 781011.
VERSUS
SMT. BHANU PRABHA DAS
W/O LATE PARESH CH. DAS, R/O BATA BUILDING, MALIGAON CHARIALI, GUWAHATI, P.S.- JALUKBARI, DIST.- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, PIN- 781012
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. J K DAS, MR. DHANANJAY
TALUKDAR,MR. TAPOBRAT CHHETRI,MR. A GANGULY
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. K KALITA, MR BASAB DEY,MR P C DEY
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
07.09.2026
1. Heard Mr. A. Ganguli, the learned counsel for the appellant/applicant. Also heard Mr. P. C. Dey, the learned counsel for the sole respondent, who submits that in this appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, the appellant has impugned an order passed on 31.03.2026 by the Court of learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) No. 2, Kamrup (M), in Misc. (J) Case No. 160/2026, in connection with Title Suit No. 32/2026, whereby the Trial Court refused to grant ad interim temporary injunction to the petitioner.
2. The learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that since the impugned order was passed by the court of learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), an appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 lies before the Court of learned Civil Judge
(Senior Division), Kamrup (M), and this Court does not have jurisdiction to entertain the instant appeal.
3. On this, the learned counsel for the appellant prays for allowing the appellant to withdraw the instant appeal with liberty to file the same before the appropriate court.
4. He also submits that since there is a question of limitation in filing the aforesaid appeal, hence, the time spent by the appellant during pendency of the instant appeal in this Court may be excluded from the period of limitation for filing the appeal before the appropriate forum.
5. The prayer is allowed.
6. This appeal is dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty sought for granted to the appellant.
7. The appellant would also get the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act for exclusion time, during which the present appeal was pending before this Court while computing the period of limitation for filing the appeal before the appropriate forum.
8. Consequently, the interim order granted in this appeal on earlier occasion stands vacated.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant