Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/4898/2026 of EX. HAV. VUMKHENTHANG @ EX. HAV. VUMKHANTHANG Vs UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS on 8 September 2026
GAHC010191302026 2026:GAU-AS:13086-DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4898/2026 EX. HAV. VUMKHENTHANG @ EX. HAV. VUMKHANTHANG S/O LATE THUAM ZAGIN, PERMANENT R/O VILLAGE MATA MUALTAM, P.O. P.S. CHURACHANDPUR, MANIPUR,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010191302026
2026:GAU-AS:13086-DB
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4898/2026 EX. HAV. VUMKHENTHANG @ EX. HAV. VUMKHANTHANG S/O LATE THUAM ZAGIN, PERMANENT R/O VILLAGE MATA MUALTAM, P.O. P.S. CHURACHANDPUR, MANIPUR, PRESENTLY RESIDING AND SERVING AS SECURITY GUNMAN AT NORTH EAST EXPLO CHEMICALS, SITUATED AT PODDAR COMPLEX, NARANGI, GUWAHATI- 781026. VERSUS 1: UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS. THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENSE, SOUTH BLOCK, DEFENCE HEAD QUARTERS, NEW DELHI- 110001 2:THE CHIEF OF THE ARMY STAFF ARMY HQ SOUTH BLOCK DEFENSE HEAD QUARTERS NEW DELHI 110001. 3:THE DIRECTOR FACULTY OF STUDIES COLLEGE OF COMBAT MHOW MADHYA PRADESH PIN- 453441. 4:THE COMMANDING OFFICER ASSAM REGIMENT 2 ASSAM REGIMENTAL CENTRE HAPPY VALLEY SHILLONG PIN- 793007 For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. G. Uddin, Advocate. : Mr. N. Jamal, Advocate. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. S. Chanda, Advocate.
– B E F O R E – HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. ASHUTOSH KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY 09.09.2026 (Ashutosh Kumar, CJ) After some argument, Mr. G. Uddin, learned Advocate for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition in order to pursue his Page No.# 2/2 remedies elsewhere, if so advised. In view of the above, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty, as aforesaid. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant