Gauhati High Court

I.A.(Civil)/3087/2026 of ARUP KUMAR DEY AND 2 ORS. Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS. on 8 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010178262026 2026:GAU- AS:13104-DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3087/2026 ARUP KUMAR DEY AND 2 ORS. SON OF LATE MONMOTH KUMAR DEY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- NOON NAGAR P.O. - KATIRAIL DISTRICT- CACHAR ASSAM PIN- 788804

GAHC010178262026

2026:GAU-

AS:13104-DB

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3087/2026

ARUP KUMAR DEY AND 2 ORS.

SON OF LATE MONMOTH KUMAR DEY

RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- NOON NAGAR

P.O. - KATIRAIL

DISTRICT- CACHAR

ASSAM

PIN- 788804

2: SUNIT KUMAR GOGOI

SON OF LATE PADMANATH GOGOI

RESIDENT OF DIBRUGARH DEVELOPMENT AREA

P.O.- DIBRUGARH

DISTRICT- DIBRUGARH

ASSAM

PIN- 786003

3: CHANDAN SARMA

SON OF LATE MADAN SARMA

RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- BARKURIHA

P.O.- BARKURIHA

DISTRICT- NALBARI

ASSAM

PIN- 781348

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS.

REPRESENTED BY THE LEGAL REMEMBRANCER AND SECRETARY TO THE

GOVT. OF ASSAM

JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT JANATA BHAWAN

DISPUR

GUWAHATI-6.

2:THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR GENERAL M. G. ROAD

GUWAHATI- 1

3:THE REGISTRAR GENERAL

GAUHATI HIGH COURT

M. G. ROAD

GUWAHATI- 1

4:THE LEGAL REMEMBRANCER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF

ASSAM

JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT

JANATA BHAWAN

DISPUR

GUWAHATI-6

5:THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM

LABOUR WELFARE DEPARTMENT

JANATA BHAWAN

DISPUR

GUWAHATI- 6

6:THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM

FINANCE DEPARTMENT

JANATA BHAWAN

DISPUR

GUWAHATI-6

7:THE PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A AND E)

ASSAM

MAIDAMGAON

BELTOLA

GUWAHATI- 28

8:THE PRESIDING OFFICER

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL

GUWAHATI

KAMRUP (METRO)

HENGERABARI GUWAHATI- 36

9:DILIP KUMAR DEVASARMA

SON OF LATE HARESWAR SARMA

RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 21

MEDHI PHUKAN PATH

SHIV MANDIR

LAKHIMI NAGAR

HATIGAON CHARIALI

GUWAHATI - 38

PRESENTLY WORKING AS REGISTRAR INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL

GUWAHATI

KAMRUP (METRO)

HENGERABARI

GUWAHATI- 36

------------

Advocate for : MR. K M HALOI

Advocate for : GA

ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS.

BEFORE

HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. ASHUTOSH KUMAR

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

09-09-2026 (Arun Dev Choudhury,J)

1. Heard Mr. K. M. Haloi, learned counsel, for the applicants/appellants. Also heard Mr. N. K. Sarma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. H. K. Das, learned Sr. counsel/Standing counsel, Gauhati High Court; Mr. R. K. Talukdar, learned Standing counsel, Accountant General (A&E), Assam, Mr. U. Sharma, learned Government counsel and Mr. A. Chaliha, learned Standing counsel, Finance Department, for the opposite parties/respondents.

2. The present application has been filed by applicants/appellants seeking leave/permission to prefer the connected writ appeal against the judgment and order dated 22.05.2026, passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) No. 7066/2024.

3. The background facts of the present litigation are in a narrow compass.

4. The applicants are serving as Senior Administrative Assistants in different

Industrial Tribunal and Labour Courts in Assam. According to the applicants, the post of Sheristadar/Chief Administrative Officer is a promotional post filled up from the Senior Administrative Assistant. However, the judgment dated 22.05.2026 of the learned Single Judge, has the effect of curtailing the right of the applicants for promotion. It is further contended that the applicants/appellants were not parties to the said proceeding to place their versions.

5. Be that as it may, as the applicants are aggrieved by the aforesaid judgment and order dated 22.05.2026, more particularly, for the reason that the determination made is projected to be adverse to the interest of the applicants and has been taken in their absence, the present Interlocutory Application stands allowed.

6. Registry to register the connected appeal and list it on 01.10.2026 under the appropriate heading.

JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead