Gauhati High Court

WA/245/2026 of M/S BHAGWAN DAS BAGRI AND SONS Vs UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS. on 8 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010109122026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WA/245/2026 M/S BHAGWAN DAS BAGRI AND SONS A HINDU UNDIVIDED FAMILY HUF, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT GAUHATI ROLLER FLOUR MILL LTD., G.S ROAD, P.O. AND P.S. DISPUR,

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010109122026

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WA/245/2026

M/S BHAGWAN DAS BAGRI AND SONS

A HINDU UNDIVIDED FAMILY HUF, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT

GAUHATI ROLLER FLOUR MILL LTD., G.S ROAD, P.O. AND P.S. DISPUR, DISTRICT- KAMRUP M, ASSAM. REPRESENTED BY ITS KARTA SRI

BHAGWAN DAS BAGRI, SON OF LATE KISTUR CHAND BAGRI RESIDENT

OF GAUHATI ROLLER FLOUR MILLS LTD., G.S. ROAD, P.O AND P.S DISPUR, KAMRUP METRO, ASSAM, 781005.

VERSUS

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA DEPARTMENT OF POSTS, MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS DAK BHAWAN, SANSAD MARG NEW DELHI 110001. 2:THE CHIEF POSTMASTER GENERAL ASSAM CIRCLE MEGHDOOT BHAWAN GUWAHATI-1. 3:THE POSTMASTER GENERAL ASSAM CIRCLE MEGHDOOT BHAWAN GUWAHATI-1. 4:THE SENIOR POSTMASTER GENERAL ASSAM CIRCLE MEGHDOOT BHAWAN GUWAHATI-1. 5:THE DEPUTY POSTMASTER ASSAM CIRCLE MEGHDOOT BHAWAN GUWAHATI-1 6:THE POST MASTER PALTAN BAZAR POST OFFICE GUWAHAT For the Appellant(s) : Mr. R.S. Mishra, Advocate. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. S.K. Medhi, Central Government Counsel.

Page No.# 2/2 –B E F O R E – HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. ASHUTOSH KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY

09.09.2026 (Ashutosh Kumar, CJ)

After some arguments, Mr. R.S. Mishra, learned Advocate for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw this appeal in order to enable the appellant to prefer a review petition before the learned Single Judge. The permission is granted. The present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty as prayed for.

JUDGE CHIEF

JUSTICE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead