Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/4882/2026 of MUSSTT. KHATIZA KHATOON Vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS on 8 September 2026
GAHC010191002026 2026:GAU-AS:13097-DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4882/2026 MUSSTT. KHATIZA KHATOON DAUGHTER OF LATE ABDUL HAMID, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SAMDHARA, P.S. JURIA, DISTRICT- NAGAON, ASSAM. VERSUS THE UNION OF
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010191002026
2026:GAU-AS:13097-DB
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/4882/2026
MUSSTT. KHATIZA KHATOON
DAUGHTER OF LATE ABDUL HAMID, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SAMDHARA, P.S. JURIA, DISTRICT- NAGAON, ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, GOVERNMENT OF
INDIA, NEW DELHI-110001.
2:THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
HOME DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-781006.
3:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
NAGAON
DISTRICT- NAGAON
ASSAM
PIN-785001.
4:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (B)
NAGAON
ASSAM
PIN-785001.
5:THE STATE COORDINATOR
NATIONAL REGISTER OF CITIZENS
G.S. ROAD
LACHIT NAGAR
Page No.# 2/2
GUWAHATI-781003
ASSAM.
6:THE ELECTION COMMISSIONER OF INDIA
REPRESENTED BY CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER OF INDIA
NIRVACHAN SADAN
ASHOKA ROAD
NEW DELHI-110001
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K BORUAH, MS. M BHUYAN,MS. P BORAH,MS P
DAS,MR. M ALAM
Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., GA, ASSAM,SC, ECI,SC, NRC,SC, F.T
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA
HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 09.09.2026 (K.R. Surana, J)
Ms. D. Borah, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due inadvertence there is a mismatch in the annexed documents with their respective English translation. Accordingly, she prays for leave to withdraw the writ petitioner with liberty to file again. Prayer is allowed. The writ petition stands dismissed with liberty as prayed for.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant