Gauhati High Court
AB/1653/2026 of JAKIR ALI Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 8 September 2026
GAHC010148922026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1653/2026 JAKIR ALI S/O RUSTAM ALI R/O-MUSALMAN GAON, P.S. BARPETA, DIST. BARPETA, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE P.P., ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010148922026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/1653/2026
JAKIR ALI
S/O RUSTAM ALI
R/O-MUSALMAN GAON, P.S. BARPETA, DIST. BARPETA, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE P.P., ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. J C GOGOI, MS. P DAS,MR B ISLAM
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 09.09.2026 Heard Mr. J.C. Gogoi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P.S. Lahkar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State of Assam.
2. This is an application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 whereby the petitioner, Jakir Ali is seeking Anticipatory Bail apprehending arrest in connection with an FIR dated 06.07.2026, which is registered as Hajo Police Page No.# 2/2 Station case No. 304/2026 registered under Sections 303(2)/317(2) of BNS, 2023 read with Section 11(1) (d) Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, read with Section 13(1) of the Assam Cattle Preservation Act, 2021, read with Section 192 (a) of the Motor Vehicle Act (Corresponding G.R. No. 355/2026).
3. As per the allegations, a truck loaded with cattle was found in an abandoned condition and the driver and the handyman were absent. Later on, 2 (two) persons approached the police and sought to take custody of the vehicle along with the cattle by offering money to the police. The said 2 (two) persons were arrested and taken into custody.
4. Pursuant to the interim protection, the petitioner had appeared before the I.O. and his statement has been recorded and subsequently, the charge sheet has already been submitted. The certified copy of which is placed before the Court, and kept as a part of record of this case.
5. Having regard to the above, the prayer for pre-arrest bail is allowed and the interim order dated 27.07.2026 is hereby made absolute with the same terms and conditions as indicated in the interim order itself.
6. The bail application is disposed of.
7. Return the case diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant