Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/1179/2024 of MISS MIRA BORAH Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS on 8 September 2026
GAHC010025252024 2026:GAU-AS:13081 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1179/2024 MISS MIRA BORAH D/O LATE NITYANANDA BORAH, R/O NEW KALIBARI, TEZPUR, P.O. AND P.S.-TEZPUR, DIST- SONITPUR, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS
GAHC010025252024
2026:GAU-AS:13081
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/1179/2024
MISS MIRA BORAH
D/O LATE NITYANANDA BORAH, R/O NEW KALIBARI, TEZPUR, P.O. AND
P.S.-TEZPUR, DIST- SONITPUR, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS
THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF
ASSAM, HOME AND POLITICAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006
2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
ASSAM
ULUBARI
GUWAHATI-781007
3:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
SONITPUR
TEZPUR
DIST- SONITPUR
ASSAM
PIN CODE-784001
4:THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A AND E)
ASSAM
MAIDAMGAON
BELTOLA
GUWAHATI-78102
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S C BISWAS, MS. S. CHANDA,MS A BORAH,MS. U
NANDA,MR. P S BISWAS,MS. J GHOSH
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, AG
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 09-09-2026 Heard Mr. S. C. Biswas, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S. Baruah, learned State Counsel, for the respondent Nos. 1, 2 & 3 and Mr. R. K. Talukdar, learned Standing Counsel, Accountant General, Assam, for the respondent No. 4.
2. The petitioner is the unmarried daughter of Late Nityananda Borah, who was serving as an Inspector (Armed Branch) under the Assam Police and retired from service on 30.06.1992 on attaining the age of superannuation. He had expired on 25.11.2012. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking payment of family pension with effect from 25.11.2012.
3. Mr. Talukdar, learned Standing Counsel, Accountant General, Assam, by placing a copy of the order dated 02.02.2026, submits that during the pendency of the writ petition, the respondent authorities have issued the Family Pension Payment Order (FPPO) bearing No. 933422337355 in favour of the petitioner and the same has been forwarded to the Treasury Officer, Sonitpur, Tezpur, for necessary action and payment.
4. In view of the issuance and forwarding of the aforesaid FPPO in favour of the petitioner, the grievance raised in the present writ petition stands addressed. Accordingly, no issue survives for determination in the present writ petition.
5. The writ petition, accordingly, stands closed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach this Court again, if any occasion arises.
6. The copy of the communication dated 02.02.2026, is kept on record and marked as Document-X for identification. JUDGE Comparing Assistant