Gauhati High Court

I.A.(Civil)/3029/2026 of ON THE DEATH OF SHRI CHANDRA KANTA KALITA, HIS LEGAL HEIRS SRI HIRANYA KALITA Vs THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS on 7 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010170992026 2026:GAU-AS:13035 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3029/2026 ON THE DEATH OF SHRI CHANDRA KANTA KALITA, HIS LEGAL HEIRS SRI HIRANYA KALITA S/O LATE CHANDRA KANTA KALITA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/ONAHARANI

GAHC010170992026

2026:GAU-AS:13035

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3029/2026

ON THE DEATH OF SHRI CHANDRA KANTA KALITA, HIS LEGAL HEIRS SRI

HIRANYA KALITA

S/O LATE CHANDRA KANTA KALITA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/ONAHARANI PATH, BYE-LANE-I, H.NO.2, BANFULNAGAR, P.S.- HATIGAON, DISTRICT- KAMRUP M.

2: SRI KISHOR KALITA

S/O LATE CHANDRA KANTA KALITA

AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS

R/ONAHARANI PATH

BYE-LANE-I

H.NO.2

BANFULNAGAR

P.S.- HATIGAON

DISTRICT- KAMRUP M.

3: SMT BHARATI KALITA

WIFE OF SHRI CHANDRA KANTA KALITA

AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS

R/O- NAHARANI PATH

BYE-LANEI

H.NO.2

BANFULNAGAR

P.S.- HATIGAON

DISTRICT- KAMRUP M

VERSUS

THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS

REPRESENTED BY THE GOVERNOR, RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, 18TH

FLOOR, CENTRAL OFFICE BUILDING, SHAHID BHAGAT SINGH ROAD, MUMBAI-400001.

2:THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR

RESERVE BANK OF INDIA

PANBAZAR

STATION ROAD GUWAHATI

DIST. KAMRUP METRO ASSAM

PIN-781001.

3:SHRI THOTNGAM JAMANG BANKING OMBUDSMAN

RESERVE BANK OF INDIA

GUWAHATI UNDER BANKING OMBUDSMAN SCHEME 2006 C/O-RESERVE

BANK OF INDIA

STATION ROAD

PANBAZAR GUWAHATI-781001.

4:STATE BANK OF INDIA

SBI PERSONALIZED BANKING BRANCH PBB

GANESHGURI

REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER METRO SWAGOTA SQUARE

3RD FLOOR

ABC POINT

G.S. ROAD

BHANGAGARH

GUWAHATI

KAMRUP

ASSAM

PIN- 781005

REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER

5:THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER

DIGITAL AND INTERNET BANKING

STATE BANK OF INDIA

LHO

GUWAHATI

ASSAM

G.S. ROAD

DISPUR

GUWAHATI781005.

6:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE CRIME GUWAHATI POLICE

COMMISSIONERATE

OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE CRIME

CRIME BRANCH

POLICE COMMISSIONERATE GUWAHATI

DANISH ROAD

PANBAZAR

GUWAHATI-78100

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H GUPTA,

Advocate for the Respondent : MR. P HAZARIKA, MR K DAS

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

08.09.2026

1. Heard Ms. P. R. Choudhury, learned counsel for the applicants. Also heard Mr. H. S. Borah, learned counsel on behalf of Mr. P. Hazarika, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3 and Mr. K. Das, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 4 and 5.

2. The present interlocutory application has been filed for substitution of the legal heirs of the petitioner No. 1, Chandra Kanta Kalita in the connected writ petition.

3. The learned counsel for the applicants submits that the wife of the deceased petitioner No. 1, is already arrayed in the connected writ petition as petitioner No. 2.

4. After perusal of the material available on record including the averments made in the application, it is found that the present applicants are legal heirs of the deceased petitioner No. 1, who died on 18.08.2025. Accordingly, the right to sue survives upon the present applicants and therefore, the present application is allowed by substituting the present applicants namely Sri Hiranya Kalita (Son) and Sri Kishor Kalita (Son) as petitioners in place of deceased petitioner No. 1, as per the requirement of CIS.

5. The petitioner shall furnish an amended cause title in terms of Notification 19 dated 19th June, 2023, before the Registry within a period of one week from today and after acceptance of the same, the petitioner shall furnish the amended cause title to the learned counsel for the respondents.

6. Registry to correct the cause title of the connected writ petition by incorporating the name of the legal heirs of the petitioner No. 1 in his place as per requirement of CIS.

7. Accordingly, this interlocutory application stands disposed of by allowing the prayer.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead