Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/4104/2025 of PANKAJ KUMAR SANTANI Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS. on 7 September 2026
GAHC010187622026 2026:GAU-AS:13025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C) 4104/2025 PANKAJ KUMAR SANTANI SON OF SRI MUKESH KUMAR SANTANI R/O NATUNPARA WARD NO. 10 P.O. P.S. AND DIST. BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN-783380 VERSUS THE STATE OF
GAHC010187622026
2026:GAU-AS:13025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C) 4104/2025
PANKAJ KUMAR SANTANI
SON OF SRI MUKESH KUMAR SANTANI
R/O NATUNPARA
WARD NO. 10
P.O.
P.S. AND DIST. BONGAIGAON
ASSAM
PIN-783380
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS.
REP. BY THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER/ADDITIONAL DISTRICT
MAGISTRATE
BONGAIGAON (ADMINISTRATION AND MAGISTRACY B RANCH)
BONGAIGAON- 783380
2:BONGAIGAON MUNICIPAL BOARD
AT BONGAIGAON
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN
BONGAIGAON
PIN-783384
3:THE CHAIRMAN
BONGAIGAON MUNICIPAL BOARD
BONGAIGAON-783380
4:THE AEE
PWD (E) DIVISION
ABHAYAPURI- 783384.
5:THE EO
BONGAIGAON MUNICIPALITY BOARD
BONGAIGAON- 783380
6:THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
T AND CP BONGAIGAON
BARPETA
BONGAIGAON- 783380.
7:THE EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE
O/O THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE BONGAIGAON (ADMINISTRATION AND
MAGISTRACY BRANCH).
8:SRI DEBASISH CHANDA
CONVENER DISASTER RELIEF CELL
BJP
BONGAIGAON
RESIDENTS AND FLAT OWNER OF SHANTI NIWAS 1
R. K. MISSION
ROAD
NATUNPARA
BONGAIGAON.
------------
Advocate for : MR. A SATTAR
Advocate for : GA
ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS.
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 08.09.2026
Mr. A Sattar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as the order impugned in the writ petition has already been withdrawn, nothing survives to be adjudicated in the present writ petition. Accordingly, he prays for withdrawal of this writ petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition, if further cause of action arises. Prayer stands allowed. The writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal with liberty as prayed for.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant