Gauhati High Court
Cont.Cas(C)/269/2026 of SMT RINA DAS Vs AFTAB AHMED MALLICK AND 3 ORS. on 7 September 2026
GAHC010099692026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/269/2026 SMT RINA DAS W/O LATE RAHESWAR DAS, R/O BORIHAT DHUPGIRI, P.S- MIRZA, DIST.- KAMRUP, ASSAM, PIN- 781125. VERSUS AFTAB AHMED MALLICK AND 3 ORS. DEPUTY
GAHC010099692026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/269/2026
SMT RINA DAS
W/O LATE RAHESWAR DAS, R/O BORIHAT DHUPGIRI, P.S- MIRZA, DIST.- KAMRUP, ASSAM, PIN- 781125.
VERSUS
AFTAB AHMED MALLICK AND 3 ORS.
DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE, GUWAHATI, STATE BANK OF INDIA, ABC POINT.
2:SUSANTA BALLAV HAZARIKA
REGIONAL MANAGER
REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE
SBI
FOREST GATE
AMINGAON
GUWAHATI- 781031
ASSAM.
3:RANENDRA NARZARY
ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER
PENSION
PROVIDENT FUND AND GRATUITY
STATE BANK OF INDIA
LOCAL REGIONAL HEAD OFFICE
DISPUR
GUWAHATI- 781006
ASSAM
4:SUCHIBRATA DAS
BRANCH MANAGER
STATE BANK OF INDIA
BIJOY NAGAR BRANCH
KAMRUP
ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S P CHOUDHURY, DR. B. C. BORAH,MS. M BORA
Advocate for the Respondent : MR K DAS (R1, R2, R3, R4), MR. S Ali (R1, R2, R3, R4)
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 08.09.2026
Heard Ms. T. Das, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. S. P. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Mr. K. Das, learned counsel for the alleged contemnor, by placing the bank statement of the petitioner reflecting the details of the payment made, submits that the order of this Court dated 23.07.2025, passed in WP(C) No. 2689/2020, has duly been complied with by releasing the pension and other benefits payable to the petitioner and the respondent No. 4 proportionately.
In view of above, the order of this Court dated 23.07.2025, passed in WP(C) No. 2689/2020, appears to have been duly complied with.
Accordingly, contempt petition stands closed.
The copy of the documents submitted by the learned counsel for the alleged contemnor as regards the details of payment made is kept on record and marked as document “X”.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant