Gauhati High Court

AB/1643/2026 of SHRI RAMESH GUPTA Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 7 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010149272026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1643/2026 SHRI RAMESH GUPTA SON OF LATE KESHAB PRASAD GUPTA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PRATAPGARH TEA ESTATE, P.O. CHARIALI, PIN-784176, P.S. BISWANATH CHARIALI, DISTRICT BISWANATH,

GAHC010149272026

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : AB/1643/2026

SHRI RAMESH GUPTA

SON OF LATE KESHAB PRASAD GUPTA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE

PRATAPGARH TEA ESTATE, P.O. CHARIALI, PIN-784176, P.S. BISWANATH

CHARIALI, DISTRICT BISWANATH, ASSAM.

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM

REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P BORDOLOI, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 08.09.2026 Heard Mr. P. Bordoloi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. Borthakur , learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. This application has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, whereby the petitioner, namely, Ramesh Gupta, has prayed for granting pre-arrest bail, apprehending arrest in connection with Jamuguri P.S. Case No. 59/2026 (corresponding to GR Case No. 806/2026) under Sections 318(4)/316(2) of BNS, 2023.

3. It is submitted that the informant had instituted a case against the present petitioner under NI Act in respect of a cheque issued by the petitioner for Rs.6,00,000/- which was dishonored but surprisingly, the petitioner also lodged an FIR on 22.06.2026 at Jamuguri PS alleging misuse of this cheque with an intention to fraudulently withdraw Rs.6,00,000/-

4. It is submitted that the said FIR has evidently been lodged to build up a defence in the aforesaid case under the NI Act which is proceeding before the learned Magistrate.

5. Case diary as called for has been received.

6. It appears that pursuant to the interim protection granted by this Court, the petitioner had appeared before the IO and his statement has also been recorded.

7. Having regard to the above as well as the nature of allegations, the prayer for pre-arrest bail is allowed. The order of interim pre-arrest bail dated 22.07.2026 is thereby made absolute.

8. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail applications stands allowed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead