Gauhati High Court
Cont.Cas(C)/89/2016 of SMTI JYOTI PEGU Vs PREETAM SAIKIA and ANR. on 7 September 2026
GAHC010181652026 2026:GAU-AS:13031 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/89/2016 SMTI JYOTI PEGU ASSTT. TEACHER DUSUTIMUKH L.P. SCHOOL W/O SUKUMAL NARAH R/O W/NO.3 DHEMAJI TOWN MAYOMG NARAH PATH P.O. and PS. DHEMAJI DIST-
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010181652026
2026:GAU-AS:13031
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/89/2016
SMTI JYOTI PEGU
ASSTT. TEACHER
DUSUTIMUKH L.P. SCHOOL
W/O SUKUMAL NARAH
R/O W/NO.3
DHEMAJI TOWN
MAYOMG NARAH PATH
P.O. and PS. DHEMAJI
DIST- DHEMAJI
ASSAM
VERSUS
PREETAM SAIKIA and ANR.
COMMISSIONER and SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
EDUCATION ELE DEPTT.
DISPUR
GHY-6
2:SANJIB KR. BHUYAN
DIRECTOR
ELEMENTARY EDUCATION
ASSAM
KAHILIPARA
GHY-19
------------
Advocate for : MR.R GOGOI
Advocate for : MR.R M DEKAR-2 appearing for PREETAM SAIKIA and ANR.
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
08-09-2026
1. The present contempt petition is filed alleging willful and deliberate violation of the order dated 13.08.2015, passed in WP(C) No. 2865/2010.
2. By the aforesaid order, this Court issued a direction to the respondents to pay the salaries to the petitioner from the month of September 2007 till the date of disposal of the writ petition within a period of four months.
3. Mr. S. M. T. Chistie, learned counsel for the respondents/ contemnors submits that after screening procedure, the petitioner along with other similarly situated persons was appointed as Assistant Teacher with prospective effect and the petitioner had also joined his service.
4. In such circumstance, a Division Bench in WA No. 35/2026, held that the petitioner cannot be granted past salaries.
5. Be that as it may, as none appears for the petitioner in the present petition, this contempt petition stands closed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant