Gauhati High Court
AB/1784/2026 of SIRAJUL ISLAM Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 6 September 2026
GAHC010163932026 2026:GAU-AS:12907 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1784/2026 SIRAJUL ISLAM S/O ALI AJAGAR PERMANENT RESIDENT OF KUKARPAR KHONGRA P.S. SARTHEBARI P.O. KHONGRA DISTRICT BARPETA. ASSAM, PIN 781305 VERSUS THE STATE
GAHC010163932026
2026:GAU-AS:12907
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/1784/2026
SIRAJUL ISLAM
S/O ALI AJAGAR
PERMANENT RESIDENT OF KUKARPAR KHONGRA P.S. SARTHEBARI P.O.
KHONGRA DISTRICT BARPETA. ASSAM, PIN 781305
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M AHMED, MS S AHMED,MR. M M ZAMAN
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
07.09.2026 Heard Mr. M.A. Sheikh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R.R. Kaushik, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State.
2. This is an application filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 praying for grant of pre-arrest bail to the accused petitioner namely Sirajul Islam, in connection with Changsari P.S. Case No. 170/2026 registered under Section 303(2) of the BNS, 2023, r/w Section 11(1)(a) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act, 1960, r/w Section 13(1) of Assam Cattle Preservation (Amendment) Act, 2021.
3. As per the FIR, the petitioner is the owner of the vehicle in which 21 nos of cattle were being transported, and the said vehicle was apprehended by the police.
4. The Case Diary called for has been received.
5. It appears that therefrom, and as submitted by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, that the petitioner was the owner of the vehicle, which he had hired out of his relatives.
6. Pursuant to the interim protection granted by this Court, the petitioner has appeared before the I.O. and his statement has been recorded.
7. Having regard to the above, the prayer for pre-arrest bail is allowed. The interim bail order dated 24.08.2026 is hereby made absolute.
8. The bail petition stands allowed and disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant