Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/4853/2026 of MRS NAMITA SHARMA AND ANR Vs THE PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND ANR on 6 September 2026
GAHC010189532026 2026:GAU-AS:12887 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4853/2026 MRS NAMITA SHARMA AND ANR W/O PUTUL SHARMA, R/O- VILL.- NO. 2 BORBIL GAON, P.S.- DIGBOI, DIST.- TINSUKIA, ASSAM 2: SHRI DARSHAN SARMA S/O PUTUL
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010189532026
2026:GAU-AS:12887
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/4853/2026
MRS NAMITA SHARMA AND ANR
W/O PUTUL SHARMA, R/O- VILL.- NO. 2 BORBIL GAON, P.S.- DIGBOI, DIST.- TINSUKIA, ASSAM
2: SHRI DARSHAN SARMA
S/O PUTUL SHARMA
R/O- VILL.- NO. 2 BORBIL GAON
P.S.- DIGBOI
DIST.- TINSUKIA
ASSA
VERSUS
THE PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND ANR
REPRESENTED BY THE ZONAL MANAGER, GUWAHATI ZONE, UBI
BUILDING, 2ND FLOOR, HEM BARUA ROAD, PAN BAZAR, GUWAHATI, ASSAM, PIN- 781001.
2:THE BRANCH MANAGER
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK
DIGBOI BRANCH
DIGBOI
DISTRICT- TINSUKIA
ASSAM
PIN- 78617
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M U MAHMUD, MR. J UDDIN,MR. M ALI
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, PNB,
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
07-09-2026
1. Heard Mr. M. U. Mahmud, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. A. Parves, learned Standing counsel, Punjab National Bank (PNB, in short) for all the respondents.
2. By the present writ petition, Possession-Cum-Sale Notice dated 10.08.2026 issued by the respondent No. 2 is put to challenge.
3. Mr. Parves, learned Standing counsel, PNB, on instruction submits that the aforesaid Notice was issued under a hypothecation agreement entered between the parties.
4. It is further submitted by the learned Standing counsel, PNB that since the account has been regularized, the Bank has already withdrawn the aforesaid Notice dated 10.08.2026.
5. In view of the aforesaid submissions, Mr. Mahmud, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no further cause of action survives to pursue the present writ petition.
6. Accordingly, the present petition stands closed being infructuous.
7. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to approach the appropriate forum, in the event, any further cause of action arises.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant