Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/3866/2026 of HASEN ALI Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS on 6 September 2026
GAHC010151212026 2026:GAU-AS:12936 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3866/2026 HASEN ALI SON OF LATE JAHIRUL HOQUE, R/O VILLAGE NIZ - KHARUPETIA P.O. NIZ - KHARUPETIA, DISTRICT - DARRANG, ASSAM, PIN 784115 VERSUS THE STATE OF
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010151212026
2026:GAU-AS:12936
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/3866/2026
HASEN ALI
SON OF LATE JAHIRUL HOQUE, R/O VILLAGE NIZ - KHARUPETIA P.O. NIZ
- KHARUPETIA, DISTRICT - DARRANG, ASSAM, PIN 784115
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6
2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER (DC)
DARRANG
MANGALDAI
DISTRICT - DARRANG
ASSAM
PIN-784125
3:THE DARRANG ZILLA PARISHAD
MANGALDAI
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT
DISTRICT - DARRANG
ASSAM
PIN- 784125
4:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (CEO) OF DARRANG ZILLA PARISHAD
MANGALDAI
DISTRICT - DARRANG
ASSAM
PIN-784125
5:RUSTOM ALI
Page No.# 2/2
S/O LT. SAMSUL HOQUE
VILLAGE - ALIKASH P.O. GHAN SIMULI
DISTRICT - DARRANG
ASSAM
PIN- 7841
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B RAHMAN, Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, MR. W RAHMAN(R5),MR. K KALITA(R5),MR. A
SARMA(R5),SC, P AND R.D.
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
07.09.2026 Heard Mr. B. Rahman, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S Dutta, learned Standing Counsel, P & RD and Mr. K. Kalita, learned counsel for respondent No. 5. The learned counsel for the petitioner has sought withdrawal of the writ petition on instructions received from the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed as withdrawn. The interim order passed earlier stands vacated. JUDGE Comparing Assistant