Gauhati High Court
AB/909/2026 of JOYNUL ABEDIN TAPADAR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 2 September 2026
GAHC010082982026 2026:GAU-AS:12781 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/909/2026 JOYNUL ABEDIN TAPADAR S/O LATE ABDUL MUKIT TAPADAR, R/O - MAHAKHAL, P.O. P.S. - MAHAKAL, DISTRICT - SRIBHUMI, PIN 788701, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF
GAHC010082982026
2026:GAU-AS:12781
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/909/2026
JOYNUL ABEDIN TAPADAR
S/O LATE ABDUL MUKIT TAPADAR, R/O - MAHAKHAL, P.O. P.S. - MAHAKAL, DISTRICT - SRIBHUMI, PIN 788701, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, STATE OF ASSAM.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S K TALUKDAR, K G CHOWDHURY,L P BORAH,MR. J M A
CHOUDHURY
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
03.09.2026 Heard Mr. S K Talukdar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K K Parashar, learned Addl. P.P for the State who has produced the report called for by this Court.
2. This an application filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 for grant pre-arrest bail to the petitioner in connection with Hailakandi P.S. Case No. 133/2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 421/2025 under Sections 103(1)/3(5) of the BNS, 2023.
3. The report divulges that the statements of the petitioner herein was recorded and further steps should now be taken by the I.O with regard to either submission of supplementary Charge-sheet or otherwise in connection with Hailakandi P.S. Case No. 133/2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 421/2025.
4. This Court notes that in an earlier occasion, it had been submitted that the petitioner had not been put up for trial and on a later occasion the came to light that the I.O had sought the permission of the learned Trial Court to submit further/supplementary Charge-sheet in case record so required in connection with the petitioner.
5. Having regard to the fact that the statement of the petitioner had already been recorded by the I.O in the order dated 08.05.2026, it was provided that the petitioner should not be arrested in connection with the case without there being any warrant of arrest issued by the Competent Court of Law.
6. Having regard to the to the facts and circumstances of the case, this Anticipatory Application is closed by providing that in the event of the arrest of the petitioner during the investigation period he shall be released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 15,000/- with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Investigating Authority.
7. It is made clear that in the event, the Charge-sheet is submitted against the petitioner before the learned Trial Court, the petitioner shall have to avail his remedies in accordance with law for the period of Trial in so far as bail for the period is concerned.
8. Anticipatory Application is accordingly disposed of.
9. The report produced by the Mr. K K. Parashar, learned Addl. PP is kept on record and marked as ‘X’. JUDGE Comparing Assistant