Gauhati High Court
Bail Appln./2415/2026 of KHIPRA GOGOI ALIAS BABA Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 2 September 2026
GAHC010178722026 2026:GAU-AS:12780 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2415/2026 KHIPRA GOGOI ALIAS BABA SON OF SRI INDRA GOGOI, RESIDENT OF MADURI MOLAGAON, P.S. NAZIRA, DISTRICT SIVASAGAR, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM
GAHC010178722026
2026:GAU-AS:12780
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./2415/2026
KHIPRA GOGOI ALIAS BABA
SON OF SRI INDRA GOGOI, RESIDENT OF MADURI MOLAGAON, P.S.
NAZIRA, DISTRICT SIVASAGAR, ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A CHAUDHURY, MR. D BHUYAN,MR. D BORA,MR. N
MAHAJAN,MR. P K DAS
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
03.09.2026 Heard Mr. N Mahajan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K K Parashar, learned Addl. P.P for the State, who has produced the Case Diary.
2. The present petition is filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 for grant of bail to the petitioner in connection with Nazira P.S. Case No. 26/2026 under Section 61(2)/121(2)/109/308(4)/62/324(6) of BNS, 2023 r/w Section 25(1- A)/27 of the Arms Act.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that on another F.I.R lodged regarding the same incident, the petitioner had been granted default bail.
4. The learned Addl. APP has submitted that the petitioner was part of the group of person who has resorted to using illegal arms.
5. I have perused the Case Diary and it is seen that although there are allegations against the other persons of having used Fire Arms, however, considering the length of detention, age of the petitioner and the contents of the Case Diary, I am of the considered opinion that the petitioner may be granted the privilege of bail at this stage since the Case Diary does not reveal his involvement in use of Fire Arms etc.
6. Accordingly, it is directed that the petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 25,000/- with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned SDJM, Nazira. The learned SDJM, Nazira, shall be at liberty to impose such other conditions as may be necessary to ensure that the petitioner does not in any manner interfere with the investigation of the case.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant