Gauhati High Court

I.A.(Civil)/3117/2026 of PRIYANKA DEKA Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS. on 2 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010190112026 2026:GAU-AS:12876 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3117/2026 PRIYANKA DEKA W/O- BIKASH TALUKDAR, R/O. BARKURIHA VILLAGE, NEAR GOPINATH MANDIR, MOROWA KAMALPUR ROAD, P.O.-NALBARI, P.S.-NALBARI, DIST.-

GAHC010190112026

2026:GAU-AS:12876

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3117/2026

PRIYANKA DEKA

W/O- BIKASH TALUKDAR, R/O. BARKURIHA VILLAGE, NEAR GOPINATH

MANDIR, MOROWA KAMALPUR ROAD, P.O.-NALBARI, P.S.-NALBARI, DIST.- NALBARI, ASSAM-781348

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS.

REPRESENTED BY THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO

GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, THE HOME POLITICAL DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006

2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY

GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM

FINANCE TAXATION DEPARTMENT

DISPUR

GUWAHATI781006.

3:THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM

FINANCE DEPARTMENT

DISPUR

GUWAHATI-781006.

4:THE ADDITIONAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM

FINANCE TAXATION DEPARTMENT

DISPUR

GUWAHATI-781006. .RESPONDENTS

5:WAHIDA BEGUM

D/O.- IBRAHIM ALI

RESIDENT OF ECSTACY APARTMENT

FLAT NO-5

-2

LAKHIMI NAGAR

HATIGAON

P.S.- DISPUR

ASSAM .PROFORMA RESPONDENT

Advocate for the applicant(s): Mr. A Chowdhury, Senior Advocate Ms. M Borah Advocate for the respondent(s): Mr. N Kohli Senior Advocate Mr. A Roy For respondent Nos.1 to 4

B E F O R E

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

03.09.2026

Heard Mr. A Chowdhury, the learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. M Borah, the learned appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Also heard Mr. N Kohli, the learned Senior Counsel, assisted by Mr. A Roy, the learned counsel who appears on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 to 4.

2. This is an application praying for condonation of delay of 121 days in preferring the accompanying review petition filed seeking review of the common judgment and order dated 01.04.2026 passed in WP(C)No.5862/2024; and other connected writ petitions.

3. Taking into account that the applicant was earlier pursuing an appeal before the learned Division Bench of this Court and thereupon leave being granted, the Petitioner has approached this Court by filing a review petition, it is the opinion of this Court that the grounds mentioned in the present application, more particularly, at paragraph Nos. 4 and 5 constitute sufficient cause within the meaning of the Limitation Act, 1963.

4. Accordingly, this Court condones the delay of 121 days in preferring the Review Petition, for which, the instant application stands allowed.

5. The Registry shall register the accompanying review petition and thereupon list the Review Petition.

6. Accordingly, list the Review Petition on 13.10.2026.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead