Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/6588/2025 of BILAL AHMED @ MD. BILAL UDDIN AHMED Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS. on 1 September 2026
GAHC010255642025 2026:GAU-AS:12609 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6588/2025 BILAL AHMED @ MD. BILAL UDDIN AHMED SON OF LATE MONTAZIR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- BORDOLONG, P.O.- KHARIKHANA, P.S.- LANKA, DISTRICT- HOJAI, ASSAM.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010255642025
2026:GAU-AS:12609
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/6588/2025
BILAL AHMED @ MD. BILAL UDDIN AHMED
SON OF LATE MONTAZIR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- BORDOLONG, P.O.- KHARIKHANA, P.S.- LANKA, DISTRICT- HOJAI, ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS.
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND TAXATION, DISPUR, ASSAM
2:THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER
STATE TAX
KAR BHAWAN
G.S. ROAD
DISPUR
GUWHAATI-781006
3:THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX
HOJAI-1
NAGAON ZONE
ASSAM
4:THE CHIEF ENGINEER
PWD (ROAD)
CHANDMARI-781003
5:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINNER
PWD (ROAD)
HOJAI
DIST- HOJAI
Page No.# 2/2
6:THE BRANCH MANAGER OF STATE BANK OF INDIA
LANKA BRANCH
DIST- HOJAI
ASSAM-78244
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A K GUPTA, MS. M DEY,MS B SARMA,MR. R S MISHRA
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, FINANCE AND TAXATION, SC, PWD ROAD
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
02-09-2026 Heard Mr. R. S. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B. Gogoi, learned Additional Advocate General, Assam as well as Standing counsel, Finance and Taxation Department, appearing for the respondents. Mr. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition has become infructuous in view of withdrawal of recovery proceeding by the Revenue Department. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands closed being infructuous.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant