Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/6513/2025 of MARIAM BEGUM Vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND 8 ORS. on 1 September 2026
GAHC010242282025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6513/2025 MARIAM BEGUM W/O LATE AFTAR UDDIN, VILL. TELITIKAR PART-II, P.O. RAJATILLA, P.S. KATIGORAH, DIST.- CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN-788805, MOBILE NO. 9401143651 VERSUS
GAHC010242282025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/6513/2025
MARIAM BEGUM
W/O LATE AFTAR UDDIN, VILL. TELITIKAR PART-II, P.O. RAJATILLA, P.S.
KATIGORAH, DIST.- CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN-788805, MOBILE NO. 9401143651
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 8 ORS.
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF ROAD, TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS, TRANSPORT BHAWAN, 1, PARLIAMENT STREET, NEW DELHI-110001.
2:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE DISPUR
GUWAHATI-6
3:THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA
SECTOR-10 DWARKA
NEW DELHI- 110075
4:THE CHAIRMAN
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT LTD.
(NHIDCL) 3RD FLOOR PTI BUILDING 4 PARLIAMENT STREET NEW DELHI
01
5:THE GENERAL MANAGER (P)
ASSAM
AMBARI
GUWAHATI-1
6:THE GENERAL MANAGER
SILCHAR NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION LIMITED (NHIDCL) PASKER LANE SONAI ROAD
KANAKPUR PT.I
SILCHAR- 788006
7:THE PROJECT DIRECTOR NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA
(NHAI)
CACHAR
P.O. AND P.S. SILCHAR
DIST.- CACHAR
ASSAM
PIN- 788006
8:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
CACHAR
SILCHAR
PIN- 788001
9:THE CIRCLE OFFICER
KATIGORAH REVENUE CIRCLE
P.S. KATIGORAH
DISTRICT- CACHAR
ASSAM
PIN- 78880
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N ISLAM, MS. L WAJEEDA,MR. T K DEY
Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., MS J SARMAH (C.G.C),SC, NHIDC,SC, REVENUE,GA, ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 02-09-2026 Heard Mr. T.K. Dey, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. R. Boro, learned counsel on behalf of Mr. C. Baruah, learned Standing Counsel, NHAI & NHIDCL for the respondent nos. 1, 3, 4, 5, 6 & 7; Mr. A. Bhattacharyya, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue Department for the respondent no. 2; and Mr. H. Sarma, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent nos. 8 – 10.
Mr. Dey, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in so far as the relief sought for in this writ petition is concerned, the petitioner has received an amount of Rs. 36,77,866/-, which has been credited in the Bank Account of the petitioner. Since the petitioner’s grievance pleaded in this writ petition has been redressed, the petitioner does not want to pursue the present writ petition, with liberty to avail appropriate remedy in so far as some other grievances are concerned. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Dey, learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed, reserving the liberty to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy in the event there are some other grievances which are not raised in this writ petition.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant