Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/4745/2026 of ABDUL ISLAM SHEIKH Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS on 1 September 2026
GAHC010184042026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4745/2026 ABDUL ISLAM SHEIKH S/O LATE ABDUL MALEK, R/O BIDYAPARA PART-I, WARD NO. 9, P.O. BIDYAPARA, P.S. DHUBRI, DISTRICT DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN CODE 783301 VERSUS THE
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010184042026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/4745/2026
ABDUL ISLAM SHEIKH
S/O LATE ABDUL MALEK, R/O BIDYAPARA PART-I, WARD NO. 9, P.O.
BIDYAPARA, P.S. DHUBRI, DISTRICT DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN CODE 783301
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006.
2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
DHUBRI
DISTRICT DHUBRI
ASSAM
PIN CODE 783301.
3:THE CIRCLE OFFICER
BILASIPARA REVENUE CIRCLE
BILASIPARA PINCODE 783348
DISTRICT- DHUBRI
ASSAM
4:THE SUB REGISTRAR
BILASIPARA
DISTRICT- DHUBRI
ASSAM
PINCODE- 78330
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S RAHMAN, MS. S PHUKAN
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT
Page No.# 2/2
DEPT
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 02-09-2026 Ms. S. Phukan, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that she has instruction to withdraw the writ petition, with liberty. Mr. A. Bhattacharyya, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue Department, Government of Assam and Ms. M. Barman, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam are present. In view of the above submission made by Ms. Phukan, learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty, as sought for.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant