Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/2774/2026 of SRI THAGESWAR DEKA Vs THE STATE BANK OF INDIA AND 11 ORS on 1 September 2026
GAHC010219162025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) I.A.(Civil)/2774/2026 SRI THAGESWAR DEKA S/O LATE KABIRAM DEKA R/O HOUSE NO 32 KHARGHULI BANKONWAR NAGAR NEAR RAJ BHAWAN KALYANI NAGAR P.O. KHARGHULI P.S. LATASIL DIST. KAMRUP M GUWAHATI 781004
GAHC010219162025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
I.A.(Civil)/2774/2026
SRI THAGESWAR DEKA
S/O LATE KABIRAM DEKA
R/O HOUSE NO 32
KHARGHULI
BANKONWAR NAGAR
NEAR RAJ BHAWAN
KALYANI NAGAR
P.O. KHARGHULI
P.S. LATASIL
DIST. KAMRUP M
GUWAHATI 781004
ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE BANK OF INDIA AND 11 ORS
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN
BANK BHAWAN
MADAM CAMA ROAD
MUMBAI 400021
2:THE REGIONAL MANAGER
NORTH EAST REGION
STATE BANK OF INDIA
DISPUR
GUWAHATI 781006
3:THE ASSTT GENERAL MANAGER CCC
STATE BANK OF INDIA
LOCAL HEAD OFFICE
DISPUR
GUWAHATI 781006
4:THE BRANCH MANAGER
STATE BANK OF INDIA
GUWAHATI BRANCH
PANBAZAR 781001
ASSAM.
5:THE BRANCH MANAGER
STATE BANK OF INDIA
GUWAHATI BRANCH
PANBAZAR 781001
ASSAM.
6:THE STATE OF ASSAM
THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
HOME AND POLITICAL AFFAIRS DEPTT.
DISPUR
GUWAHATI 6
7:THE DIRECOR GENERAL OF POLICE
ASSAM
ULUBARI
GUWAHATI 781007
8:THE SUPERINENDENT OF POLICE
KAMRUP M
GUWAHATI 781031
9:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE
LATASIL POLICE STATION
DIST. KAMRUP M
GUWAHATI 781001
ASSAM.
10:THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
REPRESENTED BY ITS REGIONAL DIRECTOR
STATION ROAD
GUWAHATI 781001
ASSAM.
11:INDUSIN BANK
HAVING ITS REGIONAL OFFICE AT BHANGAGARH
G.S. ROAD
NEAR PF OFFICE
ABOVE BATA SHOWROOM
GUWAHATI
ASSAM
PIN 781005
12:THE REGIONAL MANAGER
INDUSIND BANK
BHANGAGARH
G.S. ROAD
NEAR PF OFFICE
ABOVE BATA SHOWROOM
GUWAHATI
ASSAM
PIN 781005
------------
Advocate for the applicant(s): Mr. R Singha Advocate for the respondent(s): Mr. J Baruah Standing Counsel, SBI
Mr. P Hazarika
For respondent No.10
B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
02.09.2026
Heard Mr. R Singha, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant.
2. This is an application filed for impleading the opposite party Nos.11 and 12 as respondent Nos.11 and 12 in the accompanying writ petition being WP(C)No.5712/2025.
3. Taking into account the order passed by this Court on 23.07.2026, it is the opinion of this Court that the opposite party Nos.11 and 12 are necessary parties to the dispute raised in the accompanying writ petition.
4. Accordingly, the opposite parties Nos.11 and 12 are arrayed as respondent Nos.11 and 12 to the accompanying writ petition.
5. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner is directed to file a fresh memo of parties before the Registry of this Court and the Registry on the basis of the said fresh memo of parties as well as the instant order shall make the necessary corrections in the cause-title of the accompanying writ petition and update the same in the CIS.
6. Interlocutory application accordingly stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant